Talk:Java Authentication and Authorization Service
Appearance
![]() | Java Stub‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||
|
![]() | Computing Stub‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||
|
My first impression of JAAS is that it is rather complex. Wouldn't it suffice to have 3 components:
- a client,
- a server session and
- a server authorisation
The client communicates with the server authorisation module, which updates the client's role in the server session. The client's role is checked before any method is called. Could anyone explain why JAAS needs 7 modules and 15 communication messages instead of only 3 modules and 3 communication messages in my approach? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.246.190.66 (talk)
- JAAS's callback handling is complicated, but that's the price of flexibility. Also, the components of JAAS are siilar to your list:
- the client application
- the common library that reads config files and routes to authentication modules
- the authentication modules
- And the messages could be characterized as:
- login-start
- callback-query
- callback-response
- login-commit
- logout
- So I don't see how you can say it's complex. It has about the same complexity of PAM, but JAAS looks a lot better specified. I don't understand the negativity that many people hold against JAAS. DLeonard (talk) 16:24, 21 January 2010 (UTC)