Jump to content

Talk:Fundamental theorem of linear programming

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by CBM (talk | contribs) at 13:46, 11 February 2010 (Rating article for WikiProject Mathematics. Quality: Start / Priority: Low / Field: applied (script assisted)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconMathematics Start‑class Low‑priority
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.
WikiProject iconComputer science Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Merge?

Merge and redirect to Linear programming#Theory, which already mentions the same property? — Miym (talk) 08:44, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's not very explicit about it though (doesn't even name it; although the present article here is also not great in that doesn't give the formal formulation). And there are proofs of the Theorem, which from what I saw are not of trivial length but should be included but might overwhelm a section of another article. --Cybercobra (talk) 10:02, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]