Talk:Grumman C-1 Trader
Appearance
![]() | Aviation: Aircraft Start‑class | ||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Military history: Aviation / North America / United States Start‑class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Main Image
Would this [1] be a better one ? --Jor70 (talk) 11:27, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
- Flying image are normally prefered but that image would need to be cropped to reduce the size of the background. MilborneOne (talk) 13:17, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
- I went ahead and adde it. We can replace it with a trimmed version once it's uploaded. Btw, I hope not too much of the image is cropped, as the backgound is very nice, to me anyway. Probably about half way between the current edge ad the aircraft would be a goo point to crop to. I may try to get to it later today, once I have access to my photo editor, though I'm not certain how to note the cropping in the new image file. - BilCat (talk) 17:56, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
The C-1 and C-2 were always my favourites embarked aircraft, anyway, there is some confusion in this article about the C-1 having an enlarged fuselage in comparison to the S-2. From this picture [2] (and our new one) the C-1 seems to be a bit fat. Also their Specifications said the S-2 is in fact longer, wider and taller (?) --Jor70 (talk) 19:39, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class aviation articles
- Start-Class aircraft articles
- WikiProject Aircraft articles
- WikiProject Aviation articles
- Start-Class military history articles
- Start-Class military aviation articles
- Military aviation task force articles
- Start-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- Start-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles