Jump to content

Wikipedia:Community de-adminship/Example

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by NJA (talk | contribs) at 16:54, 3 February 2010 (Nomination: Clarify what the diff under notices was for, and adding additional bit where evidence for attempted resolution is to be required (per the guidance)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This page is provided as an example template, from which other requests can be made. Please do not edit it.


De-adminship of Example


Further discussion is on the talk page. This page is for the nomination, poll, and closure only.

Nomination


This page is for the nomination only. Discussion should be done on the talk page.


The Arbitration Committee has passed a motion [link] to refer the de-adminship of Example (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) to the editor community.

Signed: Clerk or Arbitrator signature

We, the undersigned, propose the de-adminship of Example (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) to the editor community. An extended statement can be found on the talk page.

Signed
  1. Editor #1 signature
  2. Editor #2 signature
  3. Editor #3 signature
  4. Editor #4 signature
  5. Editor #5 signature
  6. Editor #6 signature
  7. Editor #7 signature
  8. Editor #8 signature
  9. Editor #9 signature
  10. Editor #10 signature
Notices
Evidence in support of the nomination
  • Required: [diff link]
  • Additional: [diff link(s)]

Clerk notes

The nomination has not been certified. Discussion is not yet open.

Opinion poll


The account Example (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) should have the sysop flag removed.

Support removal

  1. Nomination 1 (must also sign nomination, above, and provide detailed evidence at talk), signed.
  2. Nomination 2 (must also sign nomination, above, and provide detailed evidence at talk), signed.
  3. Nomination 3 (must also sign nomination, above, and provide detailed evidence at talk), signed.
  4. Nomination 4 (must also sign nomination, above, and provide detailed evidence at talk), signed.
  5. Nomination 5 (must also sign nomination, above, and provide detailed evidence at talk), signed.
  6. Nomination 6 (must also sign nomination, above, and provide detailed evidence at talk), signed.
  7. Nomination 7 (must also sign nomination, above, and provide detailed evidence at talk), signed.
  8. Nomination 8 (must also sign nomination, above, and provide detailed evidence at talk), signed.
  9. Nomination 9 (must also sign nomination, above, and provide detailed evidence at talk), signed.
  10. Nomination 10 (must also sign nomination, above, and provide detailed evidence at talk), signed.
  11. Support (only after nominations are complete) Example is a bad admin. Mrs. Example (talk) 16:20, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose removal

  1. Oppose. User:Example has some great contributions. They should remain an admin. Don't Desysop (talk)

Neutral

  1. Neutral Comment, signed.

Closure

All discussion should be on the talk page. This section is for the closure only.