Talk:Feature-driven development

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Method engineering, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Method engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Method engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Method engineeringMethod engineering

POV

Is it just me, or does this article (and the introduction in particular) sound far too laudatory and gushing? --maru (talk) contribs 00:01, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't that something all the methodology pages suffer to some extent? Jdmarshall 22:28, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Another question is whether this method should really belong to the family of agile methods - its more of a cut down traditional method than an agile manifesto type approach —Preceding unsigned comment added by Drjeremyrose (talk • contribs) 11:42, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tables...?

The article references Tables 2 and 3... only Table 1 is actually on the page. 134.173.60.9 (talk) 20:52, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tables 2 & 3 are currently displayed after the references. Although it's not natural for many casual readers to read that far down they are there. They're pretty big - where should these normally go? 81.200.225.99 (talk) 02:01, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]