Talk:Oops!... I Did It Again Tour

Oops!... I Did It Again Tour is currently a Music good article nominee. Nominated by Xwomanizerx (talk) at 05:01 21 January 2010 (UTC)

An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article. This review will be closed by the first reviewer. To add comments to this review, click discuss review and edit the page.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Oops!... I Did It Again Tour article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Britney Spears Unassessed High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Britney Spears, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Britney Spears on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Britney SpearsWikipedia:WikiProject Britney SpearsTemplate:WikiProject Britney SpearsBritney Spears
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Oops!... I Did It Again World Tour/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Binksternet (talk) 17:02, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

The readability index of this article is too high for most readers. Sentence structure is too long, in general.

Not enough attention is given to the opening acts. How were the acts received? Did any of them benefit from the exposure?

One spelling mistake: "broadcasted" is incorrect. The past tense of broadcast is broadcast.

Nothing is said of the backup band, the other dancers, the touring technical crew, the various local technical crews, the staging, the lighting, the sound system, the wardrobe and makeup people, the tour bus, the freight trucking, the airplanes—This was a tour, and thousands of people were involved. What microphones did she like? Was she ever late for a gig, or almost late? Did the show experience any serious misfires from pyro or equipment malfunctions? What were the differences between the various shows, if any?

No tour pix. :(

No comments from her sponsors. No comments from her producers.

I'm failing this GAN for major gaps in coverage. Binksternet (talk) 17:29, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]