Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:Articles with a single source

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Noraft (talk | contribs) at 14:44, 25 January 2010 (illustration of the roman senate?: added WikiProject Essay Classification and/or Categorization Project Banner, using AWB). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconWikipedia essays Top‑impact
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia essays, a collaborative effort to organize and monitor the impact of Wikipedia essays. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion. For a listing of essays see the essay directory.
TopThis page has been rated as Top-impact on the project's impact scale.
Note icon
The above rating was automatically assessed using data on pageviews, watchers, and incoming links.

illustration of the roman senate?

Surely that is rather an odd illustration to pick given the POV reflected in this essay? Isn't a government chamber precisely the sort of place a statement will be judged by the repute of the person making it? If that one person is respected then the statement will be accepted. If not, then it is liable to be rejected. Is that the model you are arguing for on wiki? Sandpiper (talk) 18:09, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]