Jump to content

Talk:Remez algorithm

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 131.130.17.148 (talk) at 10:06, 18 January 2010. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Does the person who made the changes before me have a source to cite? I don't see here that the algorithm as stated here converges. --Pftupper 02:27, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, see Tony Ralston's NA books, or Forman Acton's 66.94.9.51 00:04, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm still not convinced. Please cite more specifically, title, date, section, definition number, page. Penguian (talk) 03:14, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I too agree that this algorithm is not correct. Here is a simple description of it: http://www.math.unipd.it/~alvise/CS_2008/APPROSSIMAZIONE_2009/MFILES/Remez.pdf

Can someone explain to me what in the section "Procedure" the E is and where it does come from? Does it stand for Error, and if so, for what kind of error? This is totally unspecified —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.13.186.1 (talk) 15:43, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Remez_algorithm&oldid=338529683"