Jump to content

Self-Similarity of Network Data Analysis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 59.125.178.121 (talk) at 08:06, 11 January 2010 (FARIMA modeling). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Self-similarity is a special feature of network data. When operating network data, the tranditional time series models, for example a autoregressive moving average model (ARMA(p,q)), are not appropriate. Since it only provides a finite parameters model, but the network data usually has long-range dependent structure. Thus, a self-similar process for describing the network data structrue is applied. In the following paragraphs, we mention the definitions of the self-similar processes and some properties of them. At the same time, we describe some important methods for checking and applying the self-similarity of network data, such as estimating the Hurst's parameter and proposing a proper modeling method.

Definition

Suppose be a weakly-stationary (2nd-order stationary) process with mean , variance , and autocorrelation function . Assume that the autocorrelation function has the form as , where and is a slowly varying function at infinity, that is for all . For example, and are slowly varying functions.
Let , where , denote an aggregated point series over non-overlapping blocks of size , for each is a positive interger.

Exactly self-similar process

  • is called an exactly self-similar process if there exists a self-similar parameter such that has the same distribution as . An example of exactly self-similar process with is Fractional Gaussian Noise (FGN) with .

Def:Fractional Gaussion Noise (FGN)
is called the Fractional Gaussion Noise, where is a Fraction Brownian Motion.

exactly second order self-similar process

  • is called an exactly second order self-similar process if there exists a self-similar parameter such that has the same variance and autocorrelation as .

asymptotic second order self-similar process

  • is called an asymptotic second order self-similar process with self-similar parameter if as ,

Some situations of Self-Similar Processes

Long-Range-Dependence(LRD)

Suppose be a weakly-stationary (2nd-order stationary) process with mean and variance . The Autocorrelation Function (ACF) of lag is given by
Definition:
A weakly stationary process is said to be "Long-Range-Dependence" if

A process which satisfies as is said to have long-range dependence. The spectral density function of long-range dependence follows a power law near the origin. Equivalently to , has long-range dependence if the spectral density function of autocorrelation function, , has the form of as where , is slowly varying at 0.

also see

Slowly decaying variances


When an autocorrelation function of a self-similar process satisfies as , that means it also satisfies as , where is a finite positive constant independent of m, and 0<β<1.

Estimating the self-similarity parameter "H"

R/S analysis

Assume that the underlying process is Fraction Gaussion Noise. Consider the series , and let .
The sample variance of is
Definition:R/S statistic



If is FGN, then
Consider fitting a regression model : , where
In particular for a time series of length divide the time series data into groups each of size , compute for each group.
Thus for each n we have pairs of data ().There are points for each , so we can fit a regression model to estimate more accurately. If the solpe of the regression line is between 0.5~1, it is a self-similar process.


Variance-time plot

Variance of the sample mean is given by .
For estimating H, calculate sample means for sub-series of length .
Overall mean can be given by , sample variance .
The variance-time plots are obtained by plotting against and we can fit a simple least square line through the resulting points in the plane ignoring the small values of k.

For large values of , the points in the plot are expected to be scattered around a straight line with a negative slope .For short-range dependence or independence among the observations, the slope of the straight line is equal to -1.
Self-similarity can be inferred from the values of the estimated slope which is asymptotically between –1 and 0, and an estimate for the degree of self-similarity is given by

Periodogram-based analysis

Whittle's approximate maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) is applied to solve the Hurst's parameter via the spectral density of . It is not only a tool for visualizing the Hurst's parameter, but also a method to do some statistical inference about the parameters via the asymptotic properties of the MLE. In particular, follows a Gaussian process. Let the spectral density of , , where , and construct a short-range time series autoregression (AR) model, that is , with .

Thus, the Whittle's estimator of minimizes the function , where I(w) denotes the periodogram of X as and . These integrations can be assessed by Riemann sum.

Then asymptotically follows a normal distribution if can be expressed as a form of a infinite moving average model.

To estimate , first, one has to calculate this periodogram. Since is an estimator of the spectral density, a series with long-range dependence should have a periodogram, which is proportional to close to the origin. The periodogram plot is obtained by ploting against .
Then fitting a regression model of the on the should give a slop of . The slope of the fitted straight line is also the estimation of . Thus, the estimation is obtained.


Note:
There are two common problems when we apply the periodogram method. First, if the data does not follow a Gaussian distribution, transformation of the data can solve this kind of problems. Second, the sample spectrum which deviates from the assumed spectral density is another one. An aggregation method is suggested to solve this problem. If is a Gaussian process and the spectral density function of satisfies as , the function, , converges in distribution to FGN as .

References

  • P. Whittle, "Estimation and information in stationary time series", Art. Mat. 2, 423-434, 1953.
  • K. PARK,W. WILLINGER, Self-Similar Network Traffic and Performance Evaluation,WILEY,2000.
  • W. E. Leland,W. Willinger,M. S. Taqqu,D. V. Wilson, "On the self-similar nature of Ethernet traffic",ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 25,202-213,1995.
  • W. Willinger,M. S. Taqqu,W. E. Leland,D. V. Wilson, "Self-Similarity in High-Speed Packet Traffic: Analysis and Modeling of Ethernet Traffic Measurements",Statistical Science 10,67-85,1995.