Jump to content

Talk:Weakly harmonic function

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by CBM (talk | contribs) at 13:32, 9 January 2010 (Rating article for WikiProject Mathematics. Quality: Stub / Priority: Low / Field: analysis (script assisted)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconMathematics Stub‑class Low‑priority
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.


The harmonic function article summary states:

There also exists a seemingly weaker definition that is equivalent. Indeed a function is harmonic if and only if it is weakly harmonic.

But the weakly harmonic function article states:

This definition is weaker than the definition of harmonic function because it doesn't require that f is a twice continuously differentiable function. If it is the case, this definition is then equivalent to the definition of harmonic function.

--Marcianx (talk) 23:31, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, something is wrong here. In the MIT opencourseware

http://ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/Mathematics/18-156Spring2004/LectureNotes/

there are some lecture notes on weakly harmonic functions. Although it "looks" like weakly harmonic functions do not need to be twice continuously differentiable, it turns out that they are, and the two are equivalent. I will edit this article accordingly. --Paul Laroque (talk) 02:04, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]