Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaotic Code Masters
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Spartaz (talk | contribs) at 15:23, 7 January 2010 (Closing debate, result was delete). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 15:23, 7 January 2010 by Spartaz (talk | contribs) (Closing debate, result was delete)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. still not courced = unverified = delete Spartaz Humbug! 15:23, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Chaotic Code Masters (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Entirely in-universe + No claim of real-world notability + No sources found in 1 year --M4gnum0n (talk) 09:36, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge into List of minor characters in Chaotic. --Ⓔfitu (ⓉⒸ) 15:15, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. —M4gnum0n (talk) 09:42, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge as above, else delete. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 19:03, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Let the page stay. We still have some episodes to see where the other Codemasters would appear. Rtkat3 (talk) 8:38, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
- Delete, fails WP:N due to lack of third-party sources, else merge. Sandstein 21:20, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.