Jump to content

Talk:Binary File Descriptor library

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Stan Shebs (talk | contribs) at 13:46, 17 December 2009 (→GPL, so what?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Call for help Core Dump

I have described my issue in the talk about it Talk:Core_dump. Basically, I am dealing with people who are repeatedly deleting the content of this node. Need more free and open source people to come and help me out!!!

User:Mdupont 21:40 30 Oct. 2006 (CET)

GPL, so what?

"[BFD's] licensing under the GPL [...] has tended to limit its use; [...]"

Please explain why. I understand the differences between licensing a library under GPL vs. LGPL, with an LGPL-licensed library having the advantage to link it against proprietary code legally. But I don't see a problem with licensing BFD with GPL, as it seems to me that BFD is a inhouse development-only related library that does not need to be incorporated into a publicized software product. Thanks, --Abdull (talk) 08:39, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The statement should probably be whacked. Although are probably non-free or BSD-licensed programs that are having to provide their own object file manipulation when they would rather be using BFD, I can't think of any actual examples. BFD *could* be maintained as a generic system library a la curses and such, but the API would be very complicated and need continual revision to keep up with the arcana of different systems. There is a bit of chicken-and-egg going on, since potential clients are discouraged by the messy API, but API cleanup would take time away from meeting the needs of the current clients. Stan (talk) 13:46, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Binary_File_Descriptor_library&oldid=332287387"