Talk:ConScript Unicode Registry

Constructed languages Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Constructed languages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Constructed languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of constructed languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Constructed languagesWikipedia:WikiProject Constructed languagesTemplate:WikiProject Constructed languagesconstructed language
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The John Cowan referred to in this article is not the John Cowan referred to in the article of that name, so the hyperlink is now removed. --07:05, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Does someone know if John Cowan who is mentioned here is the same one as John Woldemar Cowan who is responsible for the Lojban Grammar? --213.47.109.179 18:24, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. He has a Lojban link on his home page. Deh 18:46, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article expansion?

Does anyone have ideas to expand this article, or should this be merged with something else? I suppose we could list current CSUR proposal scripts like Tengwar and Cirth? -- Jordi·✆ 09:54, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CSUR Allocations

There appears to be some discrepancies between the ranges given on the main CSUR page and the CSUR Roadmap for the Aui, Amman-Iar, Streich and Xaîni scripts. I have used the values from the roadmap since using the values on the main page does not allow enough room for the Xaîni script. --Wm243 (talk) 10:24, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alternatives?

Is there any alternatives to ConScript for registering common fictional alphabets? The trouble with ConScript is that it occupies not only the "Corporate" Private subarea, but also the "Private" Private subarea, such that a club that needs a really private alphabet, cannot combine that with also using Tengwar in their discussions. Another trouble is that it has filled up the BMP private area with alphabet with virtually no usage. Tengwar, Cirth and Klingon are widely used, most of the other not. ... said: Rursus (^mbork³) 12:31, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]