Talk:Oz (programming language)

Article lacking

This article lacks source examples and a discussion of how the different paradigms encompassed by Oz "harmoniously blends together". In its current state it is factually informative but of little actual informative use for programmers or computer linguists. Mikademus 13:00, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

== Case statement: case x of nil ← means NOTHING to me :: article presumes knowledge of language syntax and semantics. Extremely poorly thought out. WTF is "first class" ?? Written by Oz insiders apparently for the benefit of Oz insiders. Benefit to their ego, that is. Contains "MOST" paradigms?!?! "Including"...this looks to be copied from some synopsis of an article. Is NOt factually informative. Jargon content: Extreme. Information content:Low (unless information of jargon is presumed to be available)69.40.242.176 (talk) 16:30, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

Oz programming language → [

[Oz (programming language)]] – Conformance with WP naming conventions atanamir

The page was moved. Move discussion is here: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Programming languages/Renaming poll.

Question:

Does Oz support Generic programming? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.93.217.97 (talk) 06:24, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, as a dynamically typed programming language, it does trivially support Generic Programming. 92.224.156.140 (talk) 19:14, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not the Sieve of Eratosthenes

The code presented for the sieve is a prime number sieve, but it is not the Sieve of Eratosthenes. The text should be edited unless someone provides the actual sieve.