Talk:Starlight Information Visualization System

This article was nominated for deletion on October 2, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

POV problems

This article was written by one of the developers of the project (which is not a problem) except that it also reads like a press release.

I have added a POV warning template - hopefully this will bring the problem to the attention of other editors.--Commander Keane 23:17, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Commander Keane, you are correct that this was written by one of the project developers. Please advise on specific ways to improve the article. --kmote 08:27, March 16 2006 (PST)

Or better yet, improve the article so it reads more like something out of an encyclopedia. 203.122.192.233 10:57, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Since the original NPOV dispute was raised 2 years ago in 2006 and since the entry was significantly edited by another author in 2007 I propose that the NPOV template be removed from the entry. --Tdills (talk) 19:41, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

object to speedy deletion

Substantial edits made by other than the original author. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mayalld (talk • contribs) 15:10, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

De-spamming

There were so many spammy edits made that it was a G11 deletion; on re-consideration, I restored the pre-spammer version, but it's still a smidgen promotional. --Orange Mike | Talk 00:39, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE - promotional aspect. Reference to a third party publication with neutral assessment of the product would help.
-- Mark Underwood (knowlengr) 17:05, 4 December 2009 (UTC)