User:AnOddName/Snippets

I use the following for commenting, talk page tagging, edit summaries, and whatever else needs a quick response. Take and edit them for your own uses if you find them helpful!

{{subst:uw-vandalism1|Article|2=({{subst:diff|Article|7777|5555|This edit}} was reverted.)|subst=subst:}}{{subst:SharedIPAdvice}}--~~~~

warning for [[Article]] revision 7777, using {{[[Template:uw-vandalism1|uw-vandalism1]]}}

{{subst:Welcomevandal|Article|AnOddName|({{subst:diff|Article|7777|5555|These edits}} were reverted.)}}

welcome and warning for [[Article]] revisions, using {{[[Template:Welcomevandal|Welcomevandal]]}}

[[Wikipedia:Peer review/Article/archiveN|peer review]]: blahblah

archive discussions to [[Talk:Article/Archive N]]. A list of archives is given at the end of the [[:Template:Talkheader|talkheader]]

Featured article candidates

Made for use at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates.

'''Technical comments''' *No [[WP:DAB|dab links]] or [[WP:CHECKLINKS|dead external links]], and all images have [[WP:ALT|alt text]] with no obvious errors. *Ref dates are consistent [[ISO 8601|ISO style]]. --~~~~

Refs mix [[ISO 8601|ISO-style (YYYY-MM-DD)]], [[Calendar date#Little endian forms.2C starting with the day|Day Month Year]], and even a few [[Calendar date#Middle endian forms.2C starting with the month|Month Day, Year]] dates. [[MOS:DATE#Full date formatting|Use one for all of them]]. I suggest either {{{1}}} (the most common in this article's refs) or {{{2}}} (MDY is used more in the US than other countries). --~~~~

Editor, do you have any thoughts on the article, its sources, etc.? Featuring an article takes [[WP:CONS|consensus]], [[WP:NOTVOTE|not simple votes]]—if [[User:Raul654|Raul654]] or someone else decided they should [[WP:FARC|review or un-feature]] this article and wonder why you supported it, what would you tell them? --~~~~

'''Not yet.''' Though New Cutie Honey has what I consider my best Wikipedia work, it still has [[Talk:New Cutie Honey/to do|long term issues]]. There may still be some stuff from [[New Cutie Honey#References|the Perfect Guides]] I can add, but I think only interviews and other fan-oriented stuff remain; if you think the article is already comprehensive without more of that ''and'' you can address ''all'' of the to do list issues, you are clear and can consider me a co-nominator. --~~~~