Jump to content

User talk:72.1.195.4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ZooPro (talk | contribs) at 00:28, 15 November 2009 (White tiger). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Archive 1

January 2009

Talk page message

Yes I saw that and decided to ignore it. The length of one article can't be compared with another. In the case of WWII that article has been split into other articles. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 15:46, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see that either is a real issue. If it was someone might have said something before. If the article gets too long then it can be split out. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 16:26, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 16:31, 31 January 2009 (UTC

Talk page message 2

The best thing is to ignore the of topic stuff unless they contain suggestions on how to improve the article. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 21:17, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Whit tiger

Sounds good to me. Articles get long because the editors are interested in the subject. Other articles could be longer but people have less interest in adding to them. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 20:46, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Geocities

It's quite possible. I did see a "Wikipedia" at the bottom but I must admit it's so badly set up that I didn't read the whole thing. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 21:21, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think you want Wikipedia:Copyrights#Reusers' rights and obligations and Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks. Probably send them an email pointing out what they need to do. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 16:05, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I meant that you would need to email the owner of the web site and ask them to look at and comply with the Wikipedia/GFDL. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 16:37, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You represent Wikipedia as much as anyone else. There is, I think, a follow up but best to see if they will comply first. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 19:54, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
To sign just use four ~~~~. It's usually to the left of the 1 key. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 20:19, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 20:23, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
That would work as well. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 18:26, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 16:28, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 20:23, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to List of Hannah Montana episodes (Season 3). Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. NrDg 18:58, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to List of Wizards of Waverly Place episodes. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NrDg 19:58, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to List of The Suite Life on Deck episodes, you will be blocked from editing. NrDg 20:00, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

Your edits to November 10

Dear 72.1.195.4,
Some of your edits on the page November 10 have been undone by PseudoBot, a robot built to keep the date pages tidy. The problems are:

The person you added doesn't seem to have a Wikipedia page.

If the page exists, check that you've spelled and capitalized the name the same way as the article, and try again. If it doesn't yet exist, read this page carefully before creating it. In particular, you shouldn't create a page about yourself or anyone you know personally. If this bot has got it wrong (as can unfortunately happen), please accept its author's apologies, and (if you would like) leave a message on this talk page with the details, so it can be improved. Please see this page for help. PseudoBot (talk) 21:07, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page November 10. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. J.delanoygabsadds 21:13, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary

When you open up the page for editing there is a rectangular box just under the edit window. You can add a short description in it about what you are doing. There is a better explanation at Help:Edit summary. Cheers. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 14:58, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

References

I've had a look and it appears that the orignal references were the better ones. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 15:54, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ref fix

Fixed it. Cheers. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 17:53, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Images

The probelm is caused by having two iamges close together in the opening and is only visible in IE and not in Firefox. I moved one down so it should be OK in both browsers now. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 15:32, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. That sort of thing is one of the reasons I quit using IE. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 15:41, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It's probably OK to leave them for now. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 15:52, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tiger

Probably someone who didn't know the correct one. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 17:23, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Box, etc

I removed the box after I re-read the talk page. You will need to check the other edits that they made. Because I have edited the page I can't protect it as well. It would need another admin for that and it's unlikely to happen unless there is a major edit war. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 15:24, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Had me worried there. I thought I'd screwed up, again. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 15:39, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:36, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bioextra

To fix both problems you would probably have to revert to an earlier version of the page where the material nad the references still matched. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 14:38, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The reason I didn't revert it was because I wasn't sure which is the correct version to go back to. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 14:52, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Cheers. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 15:29, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image

Fixed it. Cheers. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 16:01, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

I have blanked the templated message I left on the page in error. Apologies Tiderolls 15:04, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I will assume that you are editing in good faith, given your explanation on my talk page, so I'm removing the templated warning. I'm not an expert on this subject, but under the circumstances, you should not simply keep removing the content. Take it to the article's talk page, discuss there, and then change the article in accordance with the consensus reached. Any reasonably competent RC patroller who sees your edit - which removes massive amount of content w/o any substantive edit summary - will likely revert it. So I strongly urge you to obtain a consensus first. Tim Song (talk) 15:29, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:00, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:

Hello, 72.1.195.4. You have new messages at Tide rolls's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Differences

This is the difference between the start of the edits Bioxtra made and the last edit you made and this is the difference between the first edits Bioextra made and what I restored. Other than changing a header these are the only other edits they made. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 16:12, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've restored it now. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 14:24, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good to me. By the way heterozygous is a redirect to Zygosity. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 14:40, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

National Zoological Park Delhi

I removed the image as it doesn't exist and I see the Oregon Petition page has been moved protected. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 15:57, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from White tiger. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sheogorath 3h*kwnN81 (talk) 19:02, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please explain in the edit summary or the article discussion page why you are making those edits. Sheogorath 3h*kwnN81 (talk) 19:03, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

White Tiger updates

Hey, I've noticed that you were trying to clean up the White Tiger article and that people are reverting changes because they didn't see a reason. I would recommend putting an edit summary (in the box at the bottom) for each of your changes explaining why (I.E information already in standard tiger article) so that people can see why your doing it. Jamesofur (talk) 19:18, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On a side note I noticed you requested protection for the article in another talk page note. I wanted to point out that if the article is semi-protected (the most common meathod which means new accounts and ip's can't edit it) you wouldn't be able to edit the article either. You may want to consider creating an account since it appears you know what your doing and are trying to make the project better. That way you won't be caught up in problems when others vandalize from the same ip range as you. After a couple months you will also become autoconfirmed which will allow you to edit semi-protected articles. Jamesofur (talk) 19:23, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, 72.1.195.4. You have new messages at Rpeh's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to White tiger, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Please do not delete content without an edit summary. Thank you. Captain Infinity (talk) 19:26, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Editing

I see that you are giving an edit summary but I think that you need to explain on Talk:Whit tiger why that needs removing as well. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 14:55, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tiger

You can do the revert yourself if you want. This is the difference between my last edit on the left and the current edit. Just click on the left edit button and it will restore that version. However, I see that there are errors in both versions that will need fixing. First of all the section on Heterozygous tiger (it's a redirect to White tiger) needs to be put back. See Talk:Heterozygous tiger as to why it is here. Also I see that in both versions there are images that need fixing. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 15:24, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tiger

I'm not sure because there has been several people editing it. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 04:46, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Paid To Click. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --bonadea contributions talk 17:35, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

White tiger

Please Explain your edits to white tiger, u copied and pasted from another article with out any good or valid reason. You re-added merge tags and such that were removed sometime ago as the merge was completed. As this seems to be a consistant trend from this account to edit the Tiger articles can you explain what it is you are trying to achieve?? I am here to help. ZooPro 11:35, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I did revoke my vandal warning to you as i did not consider you a vandal, now you are accusing me of vandalism????, I assumed good faith now all im getting is hostility. You copied and pasted this from an older version into the new page, completely messing up the article. Information had been merged, a new article was created and information moved into the new article, and all in effect you did was attempt to restore it to that version that was a very old edit. I see you contributed a great deal to the article and i thank you for that however i believe if we have any chance of getting this article into GA status we need to work together. When i merged and moved stuff around the article had been tagged as excessivly long, so to fix that problem i created Captive white tigers and moved all the information there. This made the article much shorter and allowed for the merge of White Amur Tiger. That subject did not need its own article as it did not contain and could never contain enough information to warrent it. I value your constuctive edits however lately all they seem to be is unconstructive. and to accuse me of doing more harm then good is just plain wrong. I would encourage you to have an account and join WP:ZOO and WP:ANIMALS to better understand what we as a larger project are trying to achieve and to help us achieve that. ZooPro 00:28, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Protection

You could log into the account that you have. I suggest that you also talk with Rjd0060 and ZooPro about what it is you are doing. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 19:04, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]