Talk:Mutilated chessboard problem

Chess Start‑class Bottom‑importance

	Chess portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chess, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chess on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChessWikipedia:WikiProject ChessTemplate:WikiProject Chesschess
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Bottom	This article has been rated as Bottom-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for deletion on 23 April 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

— Anthony 01:34, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Solution "without proof"?

Why the solution is said to be "without proof"?--Pokipsy76 (talk) 08:56, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge disscussion

Gomory's theorem is nearly the same thing. Should this be merged? If not, at least links between these articles would be appropriate. --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 10:01, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

They are not quite the same thing (this article is about nonexistence of solutions on a chessboard with some two particular squares removed, Gomory's theorem is about existence for some other removals) but they are so close that I agree it makes sense to merge them. I have gone ahead and performed the merge. —David Eppstein (talk) 15:28, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]