Talk:Object language

Computing Disambig‑class

	This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Disambig	This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Philosophy: Logic / Language Disambig‑class

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

Disambig

This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Logic
	Philosophy of language

This definition seems to conflict with the artlcle.. I don't know which one is correct... http://www.hyperdictionary.com/dictionary/object+language Evil saltine 10:50, 23 Dec 2003 (UTC)

Yeah, this one is totally bizarre. We have object code for the one that is a compilation stage. Stan 17:19, 23 Dec 2003 (UTC)

As the one who rewrote the article (and as a computer engineer too), I think the article is wrong. I was going based off of what the original poster submitted and I wasn't thinking hard about it for myself. Typically, "Meta" (in a programming sense) is the highest language. The code producted by the compiler is typically refered to as the object code. --Raul654 19:26, 23 Dec 2003 (UTC)

Split

These notions are too different for a single article. We should have articles on notions, not on dictionary idioms. Pcap ping 19:47, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]