Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Core-based trees

Core-based trees

Delete yet more nonsense from User:Chris04 (see Scottish hell). Hu 02:31, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'd still prefer to speedy this. It's part of a pattern of complete bollocks. Durova 03:15, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'll reverse my vote if someone who knows the subject turns this into an actual stub. Thanks to Uncle G the user talk page has enough links for reference and citations. Durova 05:01, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I posted my research on the talk page to this article. Durova 03:17, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Formally, this article is original research, and possibly hoax vandalism. Informally, this article is, as it stands, complete and utter tripe. The formula that purports to show the probability of "rejection" of computer viruses based upon Planck's constant, and the idea of dismantling a computer virus "for the sap it provides", are both total rubbish. Durova has identified what core-based trees actually are. For sources that verify this, see the references at Talk:Core-based trees. I suggest that Durova, or anyone else willing, perform a quick rewrite, based upon the sources given on the talk page, and turn this into a {{compu-network-stub}}. Uncle G 04:36, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Complete Rewrite. If not rewritten, delete. The way the article is now is drivel. The few things it asserts coherently are ridiculous and wrong. Reyk 06:56, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not sure this bit of jargon is noteworthy; and even if it means something to someone, this gibberish will not help anyone write a valid article. Smerdis of Tlön 15:15, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]