Template:Arbitration case implementation notes
Implementation Notes
Clerks and Arbitrators should use this section to clarify their understanding of the final decision--at a minimum, a list of items that have passed. Additionally, a list of which remedies are conditional on others (for instance a ban that should only be implemented if a mentorship should fail), and so on. Arbitrators should not pass the motion until they are satisfied with the implementation notes.
These notes were last updated at 01:22, 10 September 2009 (UTC); the last edit to this page was on 01:22, 10 September 2009 (UTC) by User:Hersfold.
For this case there are 14 active arbitrators. 8 support or oppose votes are a majority.
| Abstentions | Support votes needed for majority |
|---|---|
| 0 | 8 |
| 1–2 | 7 |
| 3–4 | 6 |
| Proposal Name | Proposal Number | Support | Oppose | Abstain | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proposed Principles | ||||||
| Proposed Findings of Fact | ||||||
| Proposed Remedies | ||||||
| Proposed Enforcement Provisions | ||||||
- Notes