Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Monty Python

Portal:Monty Python

Unused, single editor, probably test page. Magioladitis (talk) 13:46, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - on the way to being a decent portal, someone might want to pick up where the editor left off. Deletion does not save space. I left a note for the WikiProject. –xeno^talk 13:54, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - a good start for a Portal. I know nothing about creating them, so I can't work on it, but I think this would be a useful portal. -- PhantomSteve (Contact Me, My Contribs) 14:04, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep these portal deletions, which everyone disagrees with, are starting to become WP:POINT nominations. Ikip (talk) 14:20, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No. I am not nominating to WP:POINT something. I never do that. -- Magioladitis (talk) 18:06, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - as the originator of this portal, I can assure you it's not a test page - I'd do that in my namespace. I had every intention of working more on this, but life got busy and it didn't happen. I'll admit I'm not familiar with deletion policy in this case, but what evidence is there that it is 'unused' and what difference does it make if there is a single editor? — Zaui (talk) 16:03, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That only you contributed on this one is a strong evidence that the community doesn't feel like maintaining a portal for the subject. Sorry for thinking it was a test page but there seem to be four subpages missing. It's incomplete and Portal:Monty Python/Selected skit is just complete of red links. -- Magioladitis (talk) 19:53, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Are these grounds for deletion? From my looking around there really isn't any criteria for Portals. This portal is, admittedly, unfinished, but that's not a reason to delete, in my opinion. We're not on a deadline. — Zaui (talk) 21:26, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have initiated a discussion on this broader issue here: Wikipedia talk:Portal#Does a portal need to be actively edited in order to be useful?. –xeno^talk 16:06, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]