User talk:I'm On Base

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by .

I'm On Base's Current talk page


Wikipedia ads	file info – show another – #171

userbox

how about this one, bro.

This user is a fan of I'm On Base

3nih (talk)

RfB

Just now, someone tranascluded the RfB you created a couple of days ago to WP:RFA. I've removed it. Was this what you wanted, or was this done without your knowledge? --barneca (talk) 01:35, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your RfB

I strongly suggest you immediately withdraw your RfB. You are completely unqualified for this position, and your nomination reflects badly on you. It will be rejected. Please save yourself and everyone else the trouble of multiple opposes before it is closed early by someone else. Thanks, Gwernol 01:36, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gwernol, User:LAX transcluded it, not I'm on Base. I'm not entirely sure I'm on Base even knew it was live, and suspect this was a test. I've removed it from WP:RFA (see above), and plan to delete it as a test page unless I'm on Base gives me a good reason not to. I'm on Base, is this OK with you? --barneca (talk) 01:40, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this is certainly possible, although I'm On Base accepted his self-nomination, so deserves at least some of the "credit" for this. Gwernol 02:06, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I'm On Base didn't accept the nomination, even though it was a self nom. I've also asked the admin who transcluded to comment on their talk. SynergeticMaggot (talk) 02:21, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm... perhaps you're right. I was reading this as a signed acceptance. I guess it technically doesn't say "I accept", though I initially read it as an accepted RfB. Gwernol 02:26, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I closed the RfB, as you are not an admin yet, and this is grounds to immediately remove and close. I suggest you read WP:ADMIN and WP:CRAT, as well as anything in Category:Wikipedia adminship. Please don't let this stop you from contributing to wikipedia. Best wishes. SynergeticMaggot (talk) 02:04, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

mushroomhead7697

he is a sockpuppet of TheGoodSide. he made it first and used his "good" account and the sockpuppet one one for evil

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

I'm On Base (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

67.189.185.73 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Mushroomhead7697". The reason given for Mushroomhead7697's block is: "Vandalism-only account".

Blocking administrator: Discospinster (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: For violating our Wikipedia:Sock puppetry policy which prohibits the use of multiple accounts you have now been blocked from editing Wikipedia for two weeks. Should you breach the trust of the Wikipedia community once more in this manner you may face a permanent ban from the site. -- Netsnipe ► 04:29, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since I've now confirmed that this isn't your first time violating WP:SOCK, you can now consider yourself indefinitely banned from Wikipedia now. -- Netsnipe ► 04:36, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I've deleted all sub-pages save User:I'm On Base/Awards and User:I'm On Base/Guestbook (Lists to watch for possible existing socks); and the talk page archives. - jc37 05:14, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at this and wondering if we need a checkuser. - jc37 05:49, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

please

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

I'm On Base (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

please. i am sorry. i wanted to be a good user. and i am serious about my brothers. please unblock me

Decline reason:

Your brothers have nothing to do with your block. This request does not convince me that you were blocked in error. — Sandstein (talk) 12:27, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

I'm On Base (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i am not a sock puppeteer. my brother TheGoodSide is the puppeteer. he is puppeting Mushroomhead7697.

Decline reason:

Well, then, your brother has gotten you blocked. Take it up with him. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 14:34, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

I'm On Base (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

see this page. my brother admits it.

Decline reason:

According to that, you are a sockpuppet of User:3nih Gwernol 21:23, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

I'm On Base (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i am not a puppeteer. and neither is my brother 3nih. TheGoodSide my other brother is a puppeteer for mushroomhead7697. why doesn't anyone believe me.

Decline reason:

Because from our end its impossible to prove your story. An see WP:MEATPUPPET. — MBisanz ^talk 00:16, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

I'm On Base (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

see my brother 3nih's talk page. it explans everything

Decline reason:

It explains nothing. Since you keep repeating the same reasons over and over again, I'm protecting your talk page. Email the unblock list if you still want to contest this. — Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 02:44, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

I'm On Base (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I admit to being the sockpuppeter and I am sorry. I mean REALLY SORRY. Please unblock me.

Decline reason:

This does not address why we should consider unblocking you. — -- lucasbfr ^talk 12:54, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

I'm On Base (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am sorry and I won't ever use sockpuppets EVER and I will follow the rules. I am sorry and I will make it up to the comunity. I AM SORRY. please unblock me.

Decline reason:

No, not now. You've burnt your bridges for a while. Try again in a year or so. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 14:18, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

I'm On Base (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

okay its been a while since i have tried for an unblock. i have developed the patience to become a trusted user who wont sockpuppet or myspace or any of that stuff. i believe its been a while since i have tried so i am requesting my unblock Just so you know, I'm On Base and you're not. 20:13, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=okay its been a while since i have tried for an unblock. i have developed the patience to become a trusted user who wont sockpuppet or myspace or any of that stuff. i believe its been a while since i have tried so i am requesting my unblock '''''Just so you know, [[User:I'm On Base|<span style="color:#black;">I'm</span>]][[User talk:I'm On Base|<span style="color:yellow;">On</span>]][[User:I'm On Base/Guestbook|<span style="color:blue;">Base</span>]] and you're not.''''' 20:13, 11 August 2009 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=okay its been a while since i have tried for an unblock. i have developed the patience to become a trusted user who wont sockpuppet or myspace or any of that stuff. i believe its been a while since i have tried so i am requesting my unblock '''''Just so you know, [[User:I'm On Base|<span style="color:#black;">I'm</span>]][[User talk:I'm On Base|<span style="color:yellow;">On</span>]][[User:I'm On Base/Guestbook|<span style="color:blue;">Base</span>]] and you're not.''''' 20:13, 11 August 2009 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=okay its been a while since i have tried for an unblock. i have developed the patience to become a trusted user who wont sockpuppet or myspace or any of that stuff. i believe its been a while since i have tried so i am requesting my unblock '''''Just so you know, [[User:I'm On Base|<span style="color:#black;">I'm</span>]][[User talk:I'm On Base|<span style="color:yellow;">On</span>]][[User:I'm On Base/Guestbook|<span style="color:blue;">Base</span>]] and you're not.''''' 20:13, 11 August 2009 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}