Talk:Scrappage program
 | Text and/or other creative content from Scrappage program was copied or moved into Car Allowance Rebate System with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
 Category | The following sources contain public domain or freely licensed material that may be incorporated into this article:
|
Cash for clunkers
They're doing it now. Commercials (I just saw one 15 minutes ago) are all over the place and radio commentators are talking about it. I don't have time to fix this until at least Wednesday, but it's obvious this section [1] is outdated.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 22:10, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Reverted edits
Why do you keep reverting my edits? I would rather not get involved in a revert war with you. Mac520 (talk) 07:18, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
- I reverted your edits on two occasions as outlined in my edit summaries: WP:NPOV, WP:POV, and WP:RS. The content appears presented via a point of view statement referenced by a blog-type website. Also, the information was added to the lead, which changed the article in a major way without supporting paragraphs. See edit to lead below:
- [It is economically inefficient to destroy wealth in an attempt to "stimulate the economy" (See: Parable of the broken window) [1]]
- Since the information is controversial, a separate section with proper references would be more balanced. A summary could be provided in the lead as well. The above policies and guidelines are important aspects of Wikipedia. I do not wish to edit war. Any thoughts on this by other editors? All is One (talk) 17:28, 5 August 2009 (UTC)