Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of website monitoring tools

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Greg Tyler (talk | contribs) at 15:47, 30 July 2009 (Cleanup-y thang.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Comparison of website monitoring tools (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Article fails WP:NOT and WP:SPAM. Wikipedia is optimized for readers over editors, Pages consisting of redlinks are unhelpful to readers. Repositories of Red link articles do not add content or meaning to the encyclopedia Hu12 (talk) 21:37, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete while I think that almost all of the rationale for this deletion is only cause to edit the article, the first reason is sufficient: Article fails WP:NOT. It's certainly helpful, but it's not really WP's thing. Describing what a Web site monitoring tool is would be reasonable. Perhaps even listing some articles comparing them from the popular trade press would be fine, but such comparisons are ephemeral and their criteria subjective. Not encyclopedic. -Miskaton (talk) 22:10, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]