Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ReputationDefender

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Orlady (talk | contribs) at 18:46, 21 July 2009 (keep). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
ReputationDefender (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable, Promotional, References are press releases Treedel (talk) 17:47, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep, but I don't feel strongly about this article. I earlier declined a speedy deletion request for this article and today removed the prod template because I didn't see a basis for deletion. Some of the sources in the article are promotional, but it looks to me like there is solid 3rd-party coverage to impart notability. The New York Post article is about this company and looks to be a genuine journalist-written piece, not a press release. The Newsweek article is also genuine third-party coverage, and the company's involvement with the Nikki Catsouras case indicates some societal importance. Yes, the article is written like an advert, but that's a reason to improve it, not a reason to delete it. --Orlady (talk) 18:46, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]