Jump to content

Cheng's eigenvalue comparison theorem

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Sławomir Biały (talk | contribs) at 15:09, 20 July 2009 (more precise). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

In Riemannian geometry, Cheng's eigenvalue comparison theorem generally states that the larger the domain, the smaller the first Dirichlet eigenvalue of the Laplace–Beltrami operator can be. The 1975 theorem is named after S.Y. Cheng and, using geodesic balls, can be generalized to certain tubular domains (Lee 1990).

Theorem

S.Y. Cheng used Barta's theorem to derive the eigenvalue comparison theorem.

Let N be a Riemannian n-manifold and BN(pr) be a geodesic ball centered at p with radius r < inj(p), where "inj" is the injectivity radius. Let c be the least upper bound for all sectional curvatures at BN(pr) and let N n(c) be the simply connected n-space form of constant sectional curvature c. Then λ1(BN(pr)) ≥ λ1(BN n(c)(r)) is Cheng's inequality. Here λ1 denotes the first Dirichlet eigenvalue of the Laplacian in a domain.

In particular, when c = −1 and inj(p) = ∞, Cheng’s inequality becomes λ*(N) ≥ λ*(H n(−1)) which is McKean’s inequality.[1]

See also

Notes

References

  • Bessa, G.P.; Montenegro, J.F. (2008), "On Cheng's eigenvalue comparison theorem", Mathematical proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 144 (3): 673–682, ISSN 0305-0041.
  • Chavel, Isaac (1984), Eigenvalues in Riemannian geometry, Pure Appl. Math., vol. 115, Academic Press.
  • Cheng, S.Y. (1975), "Eigenvalue Comparison Theorems and its Geometric Applications", Math. Z., 143: 289–297.
  • Lee, Jeffrey M. (1990), "Eigenvalue Comparison for Tubular Domains", Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 109 (3): 843–848.
  • McKean, Henry (1970), "An upper bound for the spectrum of △ on a manifold of negative curvature", J. Differ. Geom., 4: 359–366.
  • Richardson, Ken (1998), "Riemannian foliations and eigenvalue comparison", Ann. Global Anal. Geom., 16: 497–525/