Talk:CE-HTML

CE-HTML received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

Articles for creation C‑class

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Computing B‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Internet B‑class

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

More clearer view needed ? Please read the article and discuss if you think it conveys the correct message, thanks ! Thrill59 (talk) 16:14, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's looking good! The references are particularly impressive. I have to say though that I don't understand much of it. It would be nice if the first paragraph gave a little more context and explained it in easier terms. Keep up the good work, Martin 20:17, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Added a great deal more information, and clarified some parts. Included an image to 'get the picture' early on - hope this does what it should do, Thrill59 (talk) 08:47, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]