Jump to content

Talk:Naïve algorithm

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Primary key (talk | contribs) at 03:28, 29 June 2009 (Great nontechnical naive algorithm example - looking up a word in a dictionary.: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconComputing Redirect‑class
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
RedirectThis redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconComputer science Redirect‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
RedirectThis redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis redirect has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Great nontechnical naive algorithm example - looking up a word in a dictionary.

Jon Skeet on Stack Overflow has a superb example involving looking up a word in a dictionary: "The naive implementation is to start at the very beginning, and look at the first word. Oh, that's not the word we're looking for - look at the next one, etc."

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/257331/whats-the-best-example-of-a-naive-implementation/257349#257349

Though I would not call that a naive "implementation".

Is Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.5 Generic compatible with Wikipedia's Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CCAS3U)? Stack Overflow content is licensed under the former. If I knew for sure that they were compatible I would have chucked the example in right away. I've asked Mr Skeet whether he wants to release it under CCAS3U already. He may answer here or fakemail@slopsbox.com (or he might edit it into the article himself. Heh.)

Primary key (talk) 03:28, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]