Wikipedia talk:Userboxes/Language/Programming/04
Appearance
![]() | Userboxes | |||
|
TODO
Here is what needs to be done on the page:
Series
- red-links need to be created
- Hunt down duplicates and re-direct/merge.
- {{user Perl}} vs {{User:Quasar Jarosz/Userboxes/Perl}}
- {{user prolog}} vs {{user pro}}
- Make each language internally consistent
- The entire set of userboxes for a language should use a consistent color scheme:
- [Always:] The standard language color scheme
- [Optionally:] A scheme for that language, that does not change between the levels, such as the {{User:ZabMilenko/Userboxes/php coder}} set for PHP
- The entire set of userboxes for a language should use a consistent color scheme:
- Individual Userboxes
- Any image or abbreviation in the left "id box" should link to the article about the language, but the "-x" should not be linked
- The right "info box" needs to link to, and only to a category or transclusion page
- Make sure the userbox represents the skill level (and that the non-specified version makes no skill claims).
This Page
- The markup should be cleaned:
- If it is a straight-forward list, then use {{subst:User:10nitro/Userboxlist2}} - this is a version of {{User:10nitro/Userboxlist}} optimized to reduce server load, with the downside of having to "subst" it. What it actually does is configure {{User:10nitro/usbl}} so you don't have to.
- If it includes several lists (PHP), or list with individual items (Python), use {{User:10nitro/Usbklist}} inside of {{usbktop}}/{{usbkbottom}}
- Here is a list of templates 10nitro has made that are relevent:
Other
- Do the stuff in italics on the page, such as Ruby, Smalltalk, Tcl...
- Fix Amazonien's mess.
Thank you
~ 10nitro (talk) 20:37, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
OrangeDog (talk • edits) 18:32, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
RFC
Smalltalk
- FIXME: MOVE VOTE: Please move Template:User SmallTalk to Template:User Smalltalk (lowercase "t") or Template:User st, based on a consensus
Other
SQL
SQL ? Jaydlewis (talk) 05:44, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
- It seems SQL was dropped during the split with markup, as it did not clearly fit one or the other. I've added it, and will eventually go through and find any others that were dropped. ~ 10nitro (talk) 17:41, 21 June 2009 (UTC)