Jump to content

Talk:Decomposition method (constraint satisfaction)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 78.142.164.236 (talk) at 11:55, 15 June 2009. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconComputer science Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

To do:

  • condition equivalent to hypergraph acyclicity this is said in tree clustering; move above?
  • clique-width
  • computing width and decomposition (cost, LOGCFL)
  • other structural restrictions: anything to add?
  • algorithms for the resulting acyclic problems: something else to be mentioned here?

- Liberatore(T) 19:37, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is the decomposition-example correct? "For every edge of the original graph, there is a node that contains both its endpoints": z,w are connected in the original graph, but no node exists in the decomposed graph that contains both z and w. Also, shouldn't it be "u,x,y" on the left side? Perhaps I misunderstood hypertree decomposition, it would be nice if someone else could take a look at this.