Jump to content

Talk:Dilogarithm

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SineBot (talk | contribs) at 14:24, 10 June 2009 (Signing comment by AmitAronovitch - ""). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconMathematics Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's priority scale.

Is the intent here to write a full article? All it does currently is refer to dilogarithm, which refers back to polylogarithm. Why should polylogarithm link here, then? - Gauge 00:06, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

the relationship is two-fold: 1. if someone's looking for Spence's function, he might be looking for either definition, but only one is a polylogarithm, hence the difference has to be made clear 2. if someone reading up on polylogarithms wants to know about spence's function he'll go here, and see the two different definitions. Hence I think the current state is satisfying.

OTOH if anybody wants to expand the article with the history of Spence's integral or whatever, he can of course do so, I think it is more appropriate to add this information to the article on Polylogarithms. 217.237.151.171 20:06, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Errorfix June 10, 2009

Changed from:

to:

I do not know where the original definition was taken from, but it was inconsistent with the series expansion. One of the two had to switch sign. To confirm, you can check e.g. with Mathematica:

In[1]:= Series[-Integrate[Log[1 + x]/x, {x, 0, a}], {a, 0, 3}]
              2    3
             a    a        4
Out[1]= -a + -- - -- + O[a]
             4    9  —Preceding unsigned comment added by AmitAronovitch (talkcontribs) 14:23, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]