Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/CJS102793

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Requests for adminship
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Private Butcher (talk | contribs) at 02:30, 29 November 2005 (Oppose). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

CJS102793

Vote here (0/4/0) ending 23:34 December 5 (UTC)

CJS102793 (talk · contribs)-self nominating- I have been with Wikipedia for almost two years. I have many different things, while trying to keep NPOV on all the articles I edit. I continue to read, write, and edit articles.Chaz 00:31, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:Chaz 00:32, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]


Support

Oppose

  1. While you've been here for almost one year, you only have five edits in the Wikipedia namespace not related to this RFA. Adminship requires a substantial degree of community involvement, so I'm obliged to oppose. Come back when you have had more experience dealing with other users. Titoxd(?!?) 00:43, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose. Per Titoxd. Plus you show very little use of edit summaries which makes it problem-matic for RC patrol. Give yourself another couple months to become more involved and try again.--Dakota t e 01:04, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose. Please use edit summaries when you contribute, and the preview button. All that is making it easier for other people to understand your contributions. Remember, you are not alone in here. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 01:56, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Oppose Please consider contributing more to wikipedia before re-applying. Several other users have posted unofficial standards they consider will qualify potential admin candidates. Although this is unofficial, this is a good guideline of what will qualify you in many users' eyes --Rogerd 01:59, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  5. I concur with other above. Limited Project edits and no user-talk edits will cause many to oppose. Oran e (t) (c) (e-mail) 02:15, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Oppose since I can't say per above, I won't say anything at all, since I can't give more advice than what's already given. Quentin Pierce 02:30, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

Comments

  • User has 136 edits, including almost 10% related to this RfA. I urge CJS102793 to withdraw his nomination and get some more experience with Wikipedia. I might mention that getting rid of vandalism and promoting NPOV is something you can do without admin privileges. —Cleared as filed. 00:42, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.
A. I would do my best to get rid of vandalism, and, also try to keep the NPOV on all articles that I can.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A. I am pleased with most of my work, because I know I am trying to help Wikipedia, and I am proud to know I am one of the many people helping to expand Wikipedia.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A. Sometime last year, I was part of an edit conflict over part of the September 11 article. I may have mishndled the situation, by trying to prove my point a little too aggressively. In the future, I will prove my point, but not so much that I become obnoxious.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/CJS102793&oldid=29549697"