Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/CJS102793
Vote here (0/1/0) ending 23:34 December 5 (UTC)
CJS102793 (talk · contribs)-self nominating- I have been with Wikipedia for almost two years. I have many different things, while trying to keep NPOV on all the articles I edit. I continue to read, write, and edit articles.Chaz 00:31, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:Chaz 00:32, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
Support
Oppose
- While you've been here for almost one year, you only have five edits in the Wikipedia namespace not related to this RFA. Adminship requires a substantial degree of community involvement, so I'm obliged to oppose. Come back when you have had more experience dealing with other users. Titoxd(?!?) 00:43, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
Neutral
Comments
- User has 136 edits, including almost 10% related to this RfA. I urge CJS102793 to withdraw his nomination and get some more experience with Wikipedia. I might mention that getting rid of vandalism and promoting NPOV is something you can do without admin privileges. —Cleared as filed. 00:42, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
- 1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.
- A. I would do my best to get rid of vandalism, and, also try to keep the NPOV on all articles that I can.
- 2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- A. I am pleased with most of my work, because I know I am trying to help Wikipedia, and I am proud to know I am one of the many people helping to expand Wikipedia.
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- A. Sometime last year, I was part of an edit conflict over part of the September 11 article. I may have mishndled the situation, by trying to prove my point a little too aggressively. In the future, I will prove my point, but not so much that I become obnoxious.