Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Techinline Remote Desktop

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Juliancolton (talk | contribs) at 00:28, 26 May 2009 (Relisting debate). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Techinline Remote Desktop (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Nonnotable software product; almost no sources other than company's own site; added by a Techinline company representative, see here. Also seems promotional. NawlinWiki (talk) 14:49, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. No reliable 3rd party references establishing notability, possibly spam for reasons above. Dialectric (talk) 00:19, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I am the author of this article, and would like to state that I have followed the same format as the other remote access products mentioned on Wikipedia (i.e. Teamviewer, LogMeIn). The article is completely neutral and does not contain one word of advertising. Instead it is written to help users of our product learn more about the technology and security we use.
    Furthermore, I have created links to the other products in our industry. We are a well recognized service in the remote desktop industry, and you can google "techinline" to see the 3rd party sources where we are mentioned. One of these is Lifehacker ([1]), where we are mentioned alongside LogMeIn.
    If you allow the article to stay, I will be more than happy to eliminate all of the official sources and use only available 3rd party references. Furthermore, I am confident that our users will help contribute to this article in the future, thereby expanding the sources further.
    Thank you and I look forward to a fair decision being made.Andrey4wiki (talk) 13:32, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 00:28, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]