Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trainmaster Command Control

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Power.corrupts (talk | contribs) at 20:26, 23 May 2009 (Trainmaster Command Control: keep - coverage in 19 books should suffice for inclusion). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Trainmaster Command Control (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Procedural nom, contested prod. Unreferenced. A search for references has failed to find significant coverage (only trivial or incidental coverage) in reliable sources in order to comply with notability requirements. McWomble (talk) 13:56, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This user's primarily contributions to Wikipedia have been to !vote (primarily delete) on dozens of AfDs approximately 1 minute apart from each other. See AN thread --ThaddeusB (talk) 19:12, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The threshold for notability is significant coverage in reliable sources. The article does not even assert the importance or significance of the subject let alone provide reliable sources to support such a claim. McWomble (talk) 16:00, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: control systems as a whole are clearly notable, so I have gone ahead and created that article. This could be merged there, if desired, but it is a bit long to comfortably fit so I could go either way with keep or merge. --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:49, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: has received non-trivial coverage in the following books (among others): [1]

[2] [3] --ThaddeusB (talk) 17:25, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Absolutely. What is this Not notable, no significant coverage sources claim? A Gbook search returns many book hits, I count 19 relevant references in the first 20 book hits (!) The hits thereafter are thin, but coverage in 19 books should suffice for inclusion in Wikipedia. Power.corrupts (talk) 20:26, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]