Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Java Model Railroad Interface

Weak assertion of notability but unreferenced, thus fails the general notability guideline. McWomble (talk) 16:13, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment If an article is substandard then it should be improved, not deleted. Unfortunately (in my opinion), having the references in the article to prove notability doesn't seem to be a requirement, they just have to be out there somewhere. Drawn Some (talk) 17:14, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Week keep. Has been the subject of multiple articles in at least one model railroaders' magazine (search the page for "Managing a Decoder"), and is the subject of significant treatment in a book about the digital control of model railroad layouts. I agree that the article needs to be beefed up with information from such independent sources. Deor (talk) 20:35, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as specialized software with the links Deor found. DGG (talk) 02:20, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per coverage located by User:Deor above. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 06:09, 21 May 2009 (UTC).[reply]