Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solido Design Automation
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ron Ritzman (talk | contribs) at 02:48, 5 April 2009 (Editing closing statement). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 02:48, 5 April 2009 by Ron Ritzman (talk | contribs) (Editing closing statement)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus or "nomination withdrawn". There's no point in letting this nomination collect dust for another 4 days (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:47, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Solido Design Automation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No claim to significance or notability. Refs are ambiguous: some appear to be public relations releases, others refer to 'top 100 rankings' within the industry--perhaps someone knowledgeable in this field can speak to the sources' import, but I think this is questionable enough to merit discussion. I speedied this as an anonymous IP; template was removed and management team was added. JNW (talk) 14:26, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Given the lack of response, I'd request that an admin close this if they believe the article establishes notability. JNW (talk) 11:58, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:40, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisting comment. I was going to close this as the nominator suggested but let's give it another day or so. If nobody chimes in, then it can be closed. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:42, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.