Jump to content

Talk:IBM Parallel Sysplex

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by TreyGeek (talk | contribs) at 16:32, 29 March 2009 (Merge proposal: And what about adding in IBM Sysplex into the mix??). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Why does it require z/OS R.8 for an ICF-only implementation to be viable? With CF Duplexing many installations I know run without external CFs. Martin Packer 20:22, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rebuilding CF structures

There were some improvements introduced in z/OS 1.8 for more efficient CF duplexing and rebuilding CF structures. That statement in the article makes sense to me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by BBCWatcher (talkcontribs) 14:32, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal

I think the two articles can be combined into a more fleshed out single article. In my view, GDPS is a subset of Parallel Sysplex and therefore describing the two can be done in a single article. Both articles are fairly stubby. In looking at IBM Geographically Dispersed Parallel Sysplex to try and clean it up I thought it may be better to combine them. Any thoughts from others? --TreyGeek (talk) 16:18, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just found the IBM Sysplex article. Any thoughts on merging all three together? --TreyGeek (talk) 16:32, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]