Talk:ATLAS Transformation Language
Appearance
![]() | Computing Stub‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||
|
![]() | Systems Unassessed | ||||||||||||
|
Rewrite
Seriously needs a rewrite. What's with all the unexplained, unlinked acronyms in the first paragraph? Also reads like an ad. Really really awful article. Fourdee 00:10, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, it is a horrible article. I would try to clean it up, but I know nothing of the subject. I have cleaned up the link spam though. Iolakana•T 11:54, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
- Far from being perfect, this article like many others surely needs a lot of improvements.
However the list of outrageous statements emitted above sounds more like a personal feud and looks much suspicious. I would prefer to see contributions to progressive improvements.
Kooler 19:42, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
First sentence
I doubt the correctness of the first sentence of this article. If you check the date of the initial specification of AT, you will find it is older then the QVT initiative. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.89.190.103 (talk) 20:13, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
Merge
This needs to be merged with ATL. Superm401 - Talk 00:09, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, this all started out in July 2008 [1] as a result of User:Brlouk overwriting the ATL dab page with a semi-duplicate of this article on ATLAS Transformation Language, instead of doing a proper move with Wikipedia's page move tools (not that a move over the dab page would have even been right thing to do in this case; "ATL" is used to refer to many more things, no one thing overwhelmingly more common than others). I've done the merge, though lots of cleanup of the article is needed. —Lowellian (reply) 23:29, 28 March 2009 (UTC)