Talk:Audio signal processing

Professional sound production Stub‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Professional sound production, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sound recording and reproduction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Professional sound productionWikipedia:WikiProject Professional sound productionTemplate:WikiProject Professional sound productionProfessional sound production
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Audio signal processing is not quite the same thing as just 'audio' (see for example Vinyl record), but the old page of Audio described it like it was exactly the same thing Audio signal processing. If you have some real content for Audio, please remove the redirect and do a new page :) --Tbackstr

Actually, I think 'audio' is an adjective and shouldn't be used without a substantive, like 'audio equipment'. In that case, audio really shouldn't have a separate page. --Tbackstr

nice one

i'd just like to say, what a great page. s'all. rog

Not a telecommunications stub

I agree that this is a stub, but it's not about telecoms. Can't find a more appropriate stub category though. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by JanCeuleers (talk • contribs) .

Indeed. Somehow there are no stubs at all for engineering topics. I am thinking of organizing a new stub category for electrical engineering. --Zvika 08:43, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is {{Electro-stub}} (Category:Electronics stubs). This category is large enough (between 500 and 600) to accomodate a split if a sub-topic of electrical engineering would be appropriate, though that subordination would likely to draw some criticism based on a lack of full consensus on the exact meaning of 'electrical engineering'. The {{com-stub}} (Category:Telecommunications stubs) is already a sub-category of this category. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 11:21, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

IMO, neither electrical engineering nor telecom is a sub-category of electronics. Electronics deals with hardware, and many electrical engineers (myself included) deal entirely with software, or even with the theory behind the software. I think there should be an EE-stub category, in which signal processing stubs and telecom stubs would both be sub-categories. Compare Category:Electrical engineering and Category:Signal processing which is a sub-category. --Zvika 16:51, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not all telecommunications-related topics (and therefore not all com-stubs) are to do with technology. There are many other aspects to telecommunications, including economics, regulations, services, etc. Sorry to be adding to the problem. JanCeuleers 17:25, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article improvements

The original article does not explain the concept of audio signal processing. I introduce the classical concepts of audio compressor, expander and limiters, slope, attack /release time, etc

The broadcast processors section gives the WIKI readers the last information about the technology behind the concepts of loudness and improving FM coverage.--Albert-Kraft (talk) 23:52, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted the material, because it was yet another blatant attempt to promote the work of Oscar Bonello (he was referenced 4 times in your addition). You have already been warned about this, so please stop! Oli Filth^{(talk|contribs)} 00:09, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]