Stale

Korea barnstar

Stale

– DyceBot (talk) 06:12, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Composite of images found on User:PC78/notes
Finished product (so far)

Request: Currently there is no barnstar or other award for Korea-related topics, so I would like to request a suitable image. The only stipulation I have is that it in some way incorporates the sam-taeguk symbol (shown above). All other considerations, such as whether or not it uses the original barnstar image, I leave at the discretion of whoever takes up this request, so feel free to go nuts! Thanks in advance. :) PC78 (talk) 15:30, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion: 'Kay, here's a Composite of stuff found on User:PC78/notes' page. I am an Inkscape begginer, of course, but I hope this looks O.K. Resident Mario (talk) 20:49, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ths is sutibale for a hanging medal. Resident Mario (talk) 19:55, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The bird is quite hard to see red on red... Mangwanani ^(talk) 20:47, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hope you like it. Maybe the ribbon should be wider? Hard to see? Give me a moment Resident Mario (talk) 20:55, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done Resident Mario (talk) 21:01, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers! Not quite what I was after, but I'm sure we can make use of it. Thanks for your efforts (and sorry for the late reply, I've been a bit sidetracked with other stuff). PC78 (talk) 20:00, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

thank you Resident Mario (talk) 19:00, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Baku Olympic bid logo

Stale

– DyceBot (talk) 06:12, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article(s): 2016 Summer Olympics, 2016 Summer Olympics bids and Baku 2016 Olympic bid.

Request: SVGify and upload as "File:Baku 2016 Summer Olympics bid logo.svg" -- Felipe C.S ^{( talk )} 15:08, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion:

Fetus

Stale

– DyceBot (talk) 17:40, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fetus about to be aborted

Fetus about to be aborted
SVG

Article(s): Abortion

Request: Hello. I made this image from two other images, as indicated at this image's description page. Obviously, I'm not very good at it. :) The color image was made by Andrew c, who may or may not want to help out with this request. If you all can fix this image up, then it may or may not go into the article, seeing as how there has been some disagreement about whether the Abortion article should show what is aborted. (FYI, the fetus at this stage is 1.25 inches from head to rump, so you may want to make it a bit bigger in relation to the rest of the image.) The two horizontal lines should be removed. The thing extending from the belly is the umbilical cord, and it should terminate at the surrounding surface. Incidentally, the white thing at the bottom right corner is a suction tube.

I should prbably mention that the originally-uploaded fetus image from 29 August 2007 had more kilobytes, and was pink-colored.[1] It also had a slight spot in the eye that has been correctly removed, and the lettering has also been correctly removed (however, I'm not so sure that the color should have been removed, but people objected saying it was too cute).Ferrylodge (talk) 20:48, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion:

I cannot help with this specific image request because my image is vector and your image is raster. Since mine is a diagram, there is no sense in converting it to raster. Perhaps someone could create an SVG image of a fetus/embryo? I'd recommend using another source image though, if someone is to make one from scratch, as concerns have been raised about File:10 weeks pregnant.png. Anyway, I added details to the embryo in my image per your request (see the two different version in the file history of File:Vacuum-aspiration.svg). I'm sorry that wasn't good enough. These images are related to a very long, ongoing discussion at Talk:Abortion, which means even if an image is created here, there may not be consensus for it's inclusion in that article (something to keep in mind). That said, perhaps having SVG images of various stages of fetal development (4 week, 8 week, 12 week, etc) may be quite helpful to the project as a whole, outside of the image discussions related to the abortion article.-Andrew c ^[talk] 21:46, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, we have commons:Category:Anatomical plates and drawings of the pregnancy by User:Miraceti which really could use some jazzing up.-Andrew c ^[talk] 21:49, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just so others are aware (Andrew c is already aware), when I click on File:Vacuum-aspiration.svg I do not see any fetus. My monitor is a Dell, and seems to work fine for everything else. Even if Andrew c's fetus were visible on all monitors, I still would like an enlargement at the abortion article, and I'm sure that the image I've submitted here must be more detailed than that of Andrew c. So, my request still stands, and I would be grateful for the assistance.Ferrylodge (talk) 21:54, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Basically a zoom of the SVG you used and converted to raster. I darkened the fetus by about 10% for a bit more contrast (could a graphist help with the crop, I can never get InkScape to do that correctly). I can't do much with creating a new image from scratch, if this isn't what you want/need I'll happily tag it for deletion and I'm sure one of our talented will whip something up. Hope the issues are resolved and that this helps. §hep • ^Talk 22:00, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Shep, that's definitely an improvement, as I can now actually see the fetus. However, the black-and-white image is much more accurate (e.g. a fetus at 8 weeks from fertilization has separate fingers, and has legs between the feet and body). But please don't delete your image just yet, since it may come in handy. Could one of your talented please whip something up using the black-and white fetus and/or the original color version thereof? Thanks. I'd prefer the original color version, and it seems that Andrew c would too, but there has been some controversy about whether color would be better than black and white.Ferrylodge (talk) 22:07, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And I'll repeat what I said above, please use a different source image, if possible, perhaps drawing from life. File:9-Week_Human_Embryo_from_Ectopic_Pregnancy.jpg would be good, or you could use a combination of sources from the web as references as long as you make sure it is an original work, not a derivative work (if the source files are copyrighted). www.ehd.org has some really amazing images.-Andrew c ^[talk] 22:38, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew c, I emphatically disagree. The image that you are suggesting is an embryo, not a fetus. Most induced abortions in this world involve a fetus and not an embryo. If you want us to use a real photo of a fetus, then I suppose we could use this one, but we do not have a precise age for it.

The image that I have requested goes well with your image, because it would look odd to have a drawing in combination with a photo. Moreover, the image I am requesting has been through the wringer, and has been accepted in multiple Wikipedia articles for years. Its description page provides detailed sources for verification of accuracy.

Recently, I proposed to you having an image of both an embryo and a fetus, but I do not recall you being agreeable. I could still accept that type of solution (i.e. two different enlargements, one for an embryo and one for a fetus). But I cannot agree to your request to have only an embryo, because it would be misleading to Wikipedia readers.Ferrylodge (talk) 22:54, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't saying for someone to superimpose a photo, I was asking for the graphist to make an SVG (aka digital drawing) using different source material than File:10 weeks pregnant.png. I'm not going to debate when an average abortion takes place with you here. I'd simply like for there to be good, SVG drawings of multiple stages of human development (outside of the context of abortion), and if someone is to do this, I'd recommend drawing from life. -Andrew c ^[talk] 22:59, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Look, my request here is specifically for the abortion article. If you would like to make a separate request here at the graphic lab, then please do so. And I already said that drawing from life would be fine with me, if this photo of a fetus is used, instead of a photo of an embryo. Another photo of a fetus (at 8 weeks) is here, and a drawing based on that would be fine too. However, I still think that it would be most efficient for the Graphic Lab to simply use the existing drawing that I provided, which matches up very well with the 8-week photo here.Ferrylodge (talk) 23:02, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your drawing is not in SVG format. My diagram is. Someone is going to have to convert something into SVG format. All I'm saying is that since someone is going to be converting something into SVG format (because you don't like my embryo), then there is better reference material. I didn't mean to hijack your request. I just figured if I voiced my opinion before an image was created, I'd have less reason to oppose further down the line as I could raise my concerns before hand. I'd be glad to back out of this discussion now. -Andrew c ^[talk] 23:16, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever the brave folks at the Graphic Lab do, I hope the result will depict a fetus at 8 weeks (because depicting a later fetus could be just as misleading as depicting an embryo).Ferrylodge (talk) 23:22, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not wanting to get involved in this little "discussion" too much (I don't even understand the problem!), I edited the file shep put up to reduce filesize and complexity. Just clipping doesn't remove the data, it just hides it, and makes it harder to edit, especially if you clip part by part. As long as the clipping path is on top, you can clip it all with one path - just select everything you want to clip and the clipping path, and it is all clipped by the same path. − Inductiveload (talk) 13:27, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Forgot to say - you don't need to clip to the page size - Wikimedia does that automatically. Anything that if off the "artboard" in Inkscape will be off the sides of the image. Inductiveload (talk) 13:31, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A fetus about to be aborted 8 weeks after fertilization (10 weeks gestational age).

(undent)Thanks for the comment, Inductiveload. I'm not sure if the Graphic Lab is still working on this project. Anyway, I made the image at right. If the Graphic Lab is still working on this project, there's no rush. The image at right seems better than both of the images above, for the reasons explained, but maybe the Graphic Lab can make further improvements?Ferrylodge (talk) 00:10, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Crystal Clear

Stale

– DyceBot (talk) 17:40, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article(s): Crystal Clear icon theme

Request: Recreate the image as an SVG. Jacob Hnri 6 (talk) 02:28, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion: Are any of these used in articles? --gren グレン 03:50, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The original source of these actually drew them in SVG and distributes them as PNG. You might be better of asking directly for the originals and if they'd allow us to use them here. − Inductiveload (talk) 13:00, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Town of Brunswick Seal

Stale

– DyceBot (talk) 08:01, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article(s): Brunswick, New York

Request: I'd like to see this vectorized. Hopefully it's large enough. I know it's on fair use right now, so the bot will take it off here (here's a direct [[: Graphist opinion:

As the website linked to on the image included a newsletter, I was able to use the logo embedded in this PDF document. Logo is greyscale, unchanged from what was in the newsletter. The font for the text is 'Goudy-ExtraBold', and would need to be converted to paths for correct viewing on Wikipedia articles. gringer (talk) 01:05, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mind elaborating? On the homepage of the town itself, the seal is shown. I see now that the bot has found the image, but it can (and should) still be converted to SVG. Any way of doing it based on the town website image or the image on WP? ~ ωαdεstεr16_«talk^stalk» 07:12, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To "get around the bot" we have {{GLNF}} documented above. §hep ^Talk 08:46, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To elaborate / reiterate, on the town website, there was a newsletter which included the logo as greyscale. This was what I used (and I presume what Cradel used) for the SVG file. I presume that the GIF logo on the website was derived from this vector version, or a very similar coloured variant. gringer (talk) 00:14, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the best I could do (thanks to the PDF), hope you like it, @gringer: I overwrote your file, hope you don't mind-- C D 16:27, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The seal itself is great; looks perfect. Any way of getting closer to the correct font? ~ ωαdεstεr16_«talk^stalk» 18:18, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I went back to my older seal (because it had text, rather than curves), and updated the file to make the colours match the GIF. The font used, as I mentioned earlier, is Goudy ExtraBold, which is not gratis [2]. I found a somewhat equivalent free font called Fradley, which is what I've used for the seal text now. I find the dot position interesting — the GIF on the website has the dots a bit above the centre, while the PDF seal has the dots in the centre. It's hard for me to tell which one of those two representations is the intention of the person/people who designed the seal. gringer (talk) 01:32, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see what you're saying. Those are two completely different designs. The current design is fine. I didn't look so closely at the wording on the PDF. Thanks again for your efforts. ~ ωαdεstεr16_«talk^stalk» 03:00, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Washington County, NY Seal

Stale

– DyceBot (talk) 08:02, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article(s): Washington County, New York

Request: Vectorize, please? You may want to see this as well (higher quality, I think, but it's a GIF). The shadow in both versions can be ignored. I think that was a GF addition on the part of some graphic designer there, but in common use, there is no shadow. ~ ωαdεstεr16_«talk^stalk» 17:27, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion:

Jean-Hilaire Aubame

Stale

– DyceBot (talk) 08:01, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jean-Hilaire Aubame
REstored version
Jean-Hilaire Aubame

Jean-Hilaire Aubame

Article(s): Jean-Hilaire Aubame

Request: Could someone crop the black guy in this photo? ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs/editor review)}~ 21:18, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mean with the black guy in or out of the crop? ZooFari 01:54, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I want to remove the white guy and tagline. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs/editor review)}~ 00:11, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion:

How is that? ZooFari 01:52, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like someone else wanted to keep him in gringer (talk) 22:11, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

here it is, cropped one. ■ MMXX^talk 11:00, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Doha Olympic bid logo

Stale

– DyceBot (talk) 08:01, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article(s): 2016 Summer Olympics, 2016 Summer Olympics bids and Doha 2016 Olympic bid.

Request: SVGify and upload as "File:Doha 2016 Summer Olympics bid logo.svg" -- Felipe C.S ^{( talk )} 15:08, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion:

Looks like this was created on 15th February. gringer (talk) 01:23, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Prague Olympic bid logo

Stale

– DyceBot (talk) 08:01, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article(s): 2016 Summer Olympics, 2016 Summer Olympics bids and Prague 2016 Olympic bid.

Request: SVGify and upload as "File:Prague 2016 Summer Olympics bid logo.svg" -- Felipe C.S ^{( talk )} 15:08, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion:

SVG version created 15 February by Inductiveload. gringer (talk) 01:30, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Brittonkill School District Seal

Stale

– DyceBot (talk) 08:01, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article(s): Brittonkill Central School District

Request: I'd like to see an SVG version of this seal. There are two versions to go by. One is black and white (File:BCSDSealLowRez.png), other grayscale (File:BCSD.png). The grayscale image is correct except for the very thick-lined borders. For those two borders, go by the black and white version. Note that the grayscale version is not used in any articles so it won't last on WP for long. I uploaded it only for use in conversion to SVG. The handwriting above the word "Education" says "HALSE '85". Any questions on what is included in the center, feel free to ask, though I think most of it is pretty identifiable. Thanks very much! ~ ωαdεstεr16_«talk^stalk» 06:45, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion:

Commonwealth of Independent States Union of Russia and Belarus

Stale

– DyceBot (talk) 07:03, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Move to the Map workshop Yug (talk) 12:02, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ordinate label

Stale

– DyceBot (talk) 08:01, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Graph with ordinate label

Article(s): Neurolinguistics

Request: A reviewer has requested that a label be added to the y-axis. The label should be "Microvolts." (The symbols after the +3 and -3 mean microvolts, so if a label is added then those little symbols could probably be removed and the 3s shifted to the right a bit.) Thanks, rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 07:19, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion:

Done. I took the liberty of redoing the X axis labels as text, so that the font was consistent. gringer (talk) 22:54, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Topography

Stale

– DyceBot (talk) 07:03, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Move to the Map workshop Yug (talk) 12:02, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Map to SVG

Stale

– DyceBot (talk) 07:03, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Move to the Map workshop Yug (talk) 12:02, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jesuit Missions of the Chiquitos

Stale

– DyceBot (talk) 07:03, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

too dark
altar too dark, white balance issues

Article(s): Jesuit Missions of the Chiquitos, San Javier, Ñuflo de Chávez, San Rafael de Velasco

Request: Please lighten the dark parts and adjust whitebalance. bamse (talk) 16:38, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion: Done. How is that? Let me know if you need anything else :) ZooFari 17:55, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, that was fast. I like the first picture. Also the altar in the second is improved, though the walls look a bit too green on my screen. Could you fix this in the second picture? bamse (talk) 20:29, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved

Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr.

Resolved

Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr.

Article(s): Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr.

Request: Any chance we can get a good crop and straightening of just the portrait from this scanned page. gren グレン 03:48, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion:

A very good chance, I'd say. Is that OK? My photoshop skills aren't all that. − Inductiveload (talk) 18:31, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Very good, thank you... makes using it as his portrait much easier. gren グレン 02:11, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fix streak

Resolved

A panorama of the island of Asinara

Article(s): Asinara

Request: This should be a quick one. Can you please erase the streak on the left-center side of the image? Thanks, ResMar 21:56, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion:Done. ■ MMXX^talk 11:45, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thank you very much! Currently on GAN and DYK nom. ResMar 01:47, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rio de Janeiro 2016 Ferris wheel

Resolved

Rio de Janeiro 2016 Ferris wheel
Rio de Janeiro 2016 Ferris wheel edit

Example:

Original picture
Noise edit

Article(s): Rio de Janeiro 2016 Olympic bid

Request: The picture needs noise reduction. Felipe C.S ^{( talk )} 18:15, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion: Done. Felipe C.S ^{( talk )} 23:55, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Solingen arson attack photo touch-up

Resolved

– Jackl 13:10, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Scanned photo with red glare on one side

Article(s): Solingen arson attack of 1993

Request: Any way the red glare or whatever it is can be removed to create a better-looking photo? Thanks in advance! 79.64.251.192 (talk) 19:39, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion: Removed the glare and improved the contrast. How is it now? Mononomic (talk) 02:46, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(Not requester) That looks really good! Would it be possible to un-blowout the sky? Or is it too far gone? §hep • ^Talk 02:49, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Too far gone - I tried. Sorry. Mononomic (talk) 20:30, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is never too far gone to me:) The only unfortunate thing about my changes is that I had to remove the Antenna from the house, as I used the clone tool to clone the sky from different areas of the image. Let me know if this works for you. ZooFari 01:48, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vancouver SkyTrain (very easy task to do, which can be handled in less than a minute. please just finish this :( )

Resolved

A map of the Vancouver SkyTrain.
A map of the Vancouver SkyTrain with only the SkyTrain stations.

Article(s): SkyTrain (Vancouver), List of Vancouver SkyTrain stations

Request: If you look at the images, you'll see that Main Street-Science World has a transfer station on it. The station is a ordinary station, and is not a transfer station, so should be changed to a ordinary station. -- _{signed by} SRE.K.A~~nnoyomous~~.L.24 _{(spell my name backwards)} at 05:32, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion: What do ordinary stations and transfer stations look like? Is the first map correct in appearance for all the skytrain stations? gringer (talk) 10:07, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This section was probably deleted because I didn't realize I unwatched this page. Anyways, I hope I could still reply to this. Both maps have Main Street-Science World Station as a transfer station. It has a transfer station "thing" that looks like all the other terminals + Broadway and Commericial stations. Original stations are those ones that are like Granville, Nanaimo, and others. I just want the Main Street-Science World Station to have the station changed to an original station, like what it's supposed to be. This is for both the images. Thanks if anyone replys... -- [[SRE.K.A.L.|L.A.K.ERS]] 17:58, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. − Inductiveload (talk) 18:38, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for this. -- [[SRE.K.A.L.|L.A.K.ERS]] 07:29, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is it resolved then? [|Retro00064 | (talk/contribs) |] 09:59, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is. -- [[SRE.K.A.L.|L.A.K.ERS]] 18:27, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

USMC Insignia

Resolved

– Gump Stump (talk) 21:22, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tiny PNG insignia
SVG(s) to work from
Inner part of USMC logo, converted to white/black.

Article(s): United States Marine Corps, Eagle, Globe, and Anchor

Request: This should be a quick one: just a request for a black + transparent version of the USMC insignia (the "Eagle, Globe, and Anchor") which is currently a small PNG. The SVG logo above (or alternate versions linked from its file description page) should be a good head start. - Gump Stump (talk) 04:23, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion:

Took the inner part of the SVG file and converted to white/black. gringer (talk) 05:20, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Brilliant, thank you. - Gump Stump (talk) 21:22, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

UN member states GIF cleanup

Resolved

– §hep ^Talk 16:37, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:ScrewyGIF.png

Article(s): United Nations

Request: Could someone please cleanup this GIF? It's kind of jumpy at some parts and very...messy when displayed by the wiki software, in full screen it looks fine. Thanks, §hep ^Talk 23:26, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion: Could you clarify that a little? I can't see any messiness or jumpiness. Be warned that GIFs scale quite badly by nature anyway, it'll never thumbnail nicely simply because it's a GIF. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξ φ 15:38, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There's how it renders for me. §hep ^Talk 02:23, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looks fine for me. This is probably an IE7 rendering issue for animated GIFs. Seems a bit odd that it works in full screen though. gringer (talk) 02:41, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wouldn't it look bad in full screen mode if it was IE7? §hep ^Talk 02:43, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not quite sure what you mean by full screen mode -- you could mean the browser's full-screen mode, or when viewing the image alone. If the second one, you'd only be able to compare properly if you right clicked on the image and just viewed that. The wikipedia preview will be displaying a different GIF image from the original picture. Also, I've just noticed that your preview image (1280 x 735 pixels) has a different size from mine (800 × 459 pixels). It's possible that the nearest neighbour interpolation being done with the GIF image is causing the ghosting to happen... but I still don't get any of the artefacts you've observed after setting my wikipedia preferences to allow 1280x1024 image preview limits (changing my image preview to 1280 x 735 pixels). gringer (talk) 10:38, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So it's on my end. Gotcha. Thanks, §hep ^Talk 16:37, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vectorize or PNG-ize these images?

Resolved

– Looks good. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 15:38, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

JPG 1

JPG 1
SVG 1
JPG 2

JPG 2
SVG 2
JPG 3

JPG 3
SVG 3

Article(s): Syllable rime

Request: These simple images that I uploaded a long time ago recently got tagged with {{BadJPEG}}, and I unfortunately don't have the software to convert them to anything better. If it's not too much work, though, I just need them converted to svg or png—that doesn't require anything too fancy, hopefully? rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 22:40, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion:

Done the third one. gringer (talk) 02:16, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done the others. Just in case you didn't know, Inkscape (what I used to create these) is free gringer (talk) 02:33, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Those look good, thank you. And next time I'll try to remember inkscape! rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 15:38, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Request for conversion

Resolved

– 05:17, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Image for conversion
SVG image

Article(s): Picture Candidate, Jaw, Moray eel, Pharyngeal jaws

Request: Convert to SVG, or PNG if not possible. Thank you! ZooFari 17:54, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion: I'll get to work on this one. --Pbroks13^talk? 19:12, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What do you think of that? --Pbroks13^talk? 07:50, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Impressive. But it isn't my decision. I'll see how the people at Featured pics like it. In case there is anything they might want to adjust, I will notify you to see if you can do some adjustments. Thanks in advance ZooFari 00:17, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Great SVG work ! Yug (talk) 08:35, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. --Pbroks13^talk? 08:38, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure we should remove labels. The Morey eel may be evident in the context of an article but I would recommend a version with labels... and maybe the normal jaw is self-evident but it seems odd to only label the pharyngeal one. gren グレン 02:22, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it would look better. [|Retro00064 | (talk/contribs) |] 07:23, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deccan Traps

Resolved

extinction of dinosaurs in Deccan Traps in Western Ghats, India

Article(s): Deccan Traps

Request: Retouche logo at top right and low right corner. (and upload directly over the source file.)

Graphist opinion:Done. ■ MMXX^talk 08:28, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Very good. The image is also in featured article Cretaceous–Tertiary extinction event. Thanks. --Snek01 (talk) 09:12, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

your welcome. ■ MMXX^talk 10:51, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Luna - Keele - 09.12.08

Resolved

– 08:38, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

The Moon from Keele Observatory
PNG version, levels adjusted

Articles: Once cleaned, could be used in Moon, astrophotography and Keele University articles.

Request: I was wondering if anyone would know how to deal with the light border around the limb on the Eastern half Luna in this image, and also if anything can be done about the brightness rectangles - this is the first image I've ever stitched, and I did my best, but I'm sure someone with more experience would be able to make this image much better! :-) Thanks in advance, Colds7ream (talk) 22:09, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion:

The rectangle borders would be easiest to remove from the original sources. If you've got the original images, I'd suggest using hugin for stitching, because it does blending and exposure correction between images to remove the obvious rectangles (a bit tricky to get the hang of, though). You can usually do something like this blending in an image editing program by using a softened eraser on the edges of the top layers. Despite this, that's an impressive stitching for something that's just layered and brightness-adjusted. gringer (talk) 00:50, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks! :-) I'll give that software a go, then, and see what I can do! Colds7ream (talk) 07:41, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I gave it a go, and, as you can see, the resulting image is much better! Thanks for the advice! As a result, all I'd like done is the removal of the brighter sections around the limb of the Moon, if anyone would be kind enough to do so for me. Colds7ream (talk) 16:13, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The banding is probably a result of what JPEG compression does to high-contrast boundaries (which means it may be able to be dealt with via a huge PNG file), but I'll see what I can do about that. gringer (talk) 22:58, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Given that the PNG file wasn't too big, having a similar size to your original JPEG, I've uploaded that to commons. I also adjusted the curves to make the moon surface fit into a black/white gradient. The annoying thing is that the JPEG version of the thumbnails seems to accentuate the craters, which can be quite a nice effect. I suppose now that the outer region is brighter, any ring on a JPEG version would be less obvious. gringer (talk) 23:33, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Of the two pngs you uploaded, I think I prefer the first - its less washed out and has less of a 'comet tail' than the second... Colds7ream (talk) 16:01, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, have reverted back to the first PNG. Would you prefer some other modification? gringer (talk) 02:57, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, that's brilliant! Just wondering if the slight comet tail effect could be eliminated from that picture too, because otherwise it's perfect! :-) Colds7ream (talk) 14:02, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, not quite sure what you mean by 'comet tail effect'. Could you please explain? gringer (talk) 02:29, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There seems to still be a part of the original light banding in the dark area to the west of the terminator, when the image is fully zoomed in? Colds7ream (talk) 14:37, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How about that? Now that I look at it again, I see that I was a bit too aggressive with the clipping/erasing of the dark region on the left hand side. gringer (talk) 00:28, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Have done a bit less aggressive clipping, and blurred the border. This gives a slight 'atmosphere' on the bright side, but makes the black/dark grey transition much less obvious. gringer (talk) 00:41, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Now that looks beautiful. :-D Colds7ream (talk) 00:48, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image to be Vectorize File:Mongolian-PRC.png

Resolved

– 16:28, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Article(s): at the moment Names of China and possible of adding on the People's Republic of China article.

Request: Want this script Vectorize into ".svg" for the article due to Commons:Media for cleanup.

Graphist opinion:

I'll give it a shot. --Slashme (talk) 16:41, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done, please check. I think some of the blobbiness comes from the low-res initial scan, so feel free to fix. --Slashme (talk) 17:15, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That looks great thank you no it came out fine. — ASDFGH =] ^talk? 01:04, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]