Jump to content

Talk:Resin identification code

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by PatPeter (talk | contribs) at 20:09, 24 February 2009 (Comment and dice??? Fix.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Various

Symbols don't work in either Opera or Netscape. The font codes (& #9843; etc, space inserted so code would show) are non-standard. Needs to be redone and standardized. -Vsmith 17:53, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)

  • Don't work in IE either - just checked -Vsmith 21:10, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)
    • I have now coded them as images. Alan Liefting 03:42, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)

The article on the plain chasing arrows symbol (not the plastics one) goes into detail about how it is public domain. Does anyone know if the plastics ones are public domain? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.99.34.238 (talk) 02:19, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PVC

The following quote strikes me as editorialization: "(PVC is claimed to be recyclable, but it is in fact not a single material due to the wide variety of toxic additives for various applications; PVC is fundamentally toxic waste)." I do not believe PVC qualifies as toxic (or hazardous) waste such under US or any other country's law/regulatory regimes. It is banned from use in aerosol applications, and there is concern about leaching of phthalate platicizers from some PVC products. Assuming, arguendo, that this were proven, PVC would still not qualify as "toxic waste" under any reasonable/neutral use of the language. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wabernat (talkcontribs) 05:52, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it's tree hugging hippie drama. I googled "pvc toxic waste" and the only thing I found were Greenpeace(I know right? whodathunkit?) article's that referred to it as "toxic waste" but not because PVC itself is toxic, but because the manufacturing process can be harmful to the environment according to the article. I also found that PVC is very recyclable. Removed unsourced sensationalized edit.--Papajohnin (talk) 15:03, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Table grid

The table grid is not lining up properly, can someone repair it? Ace Frahm 21:30, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to work fine here. Could you describe the issue as you experience it in more detail? –EdC 22:23, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed. The problem affected only Internet Explorer. —Remember the dot (talk) 23:15, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Photo

The photo, "Plastic_recycle.jpg", labeled as "sorted household plastic waiting to be hauled away for reprocessing", doesn't appear to be sorted to me. The description says that are sorted, but it looks to primarily be HDPE, but there is also a lot of PETE and I can quickly identify a few PP containers. If I correctly identified these types of plastic, then how could this be sorted? Chris01720 (talk) 08:05, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Recycling code legislation

I updated the information previously entered about proposed CA legislation to reflect that the bill had been significantly altered before passage, removing mention of recycling codes. I also put it under its own section, as it did not belong under the header "Availability of recycling facilities".

But is information about defeated legislation really germane on this page? I added the updated information to the page for Polylactic acid, which seems like it might be a better home for it. Sjb0926 (talk) 19:00, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Proposal

Should this page be merged with the Plastic recycling page, given that the Plastic identification code section essentially duplicates this information? hashinculde (talk) 16:17, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, merge this page with Plastic recycling. That larger page has more to it, but the this one has some content that the other could use. --Gerrygadget (talk) 00:56, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If all of the compounds listed on this page identify as plastic, Agree. -PatPeter 20:09, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

♺ , ♼ , and ♽

Anyone know of the usage for these symbols? -PatPeter 20:05, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]