Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Design knowledge

Prod was removed by creator. Page is rife with WP:OR. DARTH PANDA^{duel • work} 20:38, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- DARTH PANDA^{duel • work} 21:29, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Reads like a cross between an essay and a garbled sales pitch, and neither seem particularly notable Richard Hock (talk) 12:59, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, complete bollocks:

For the off-line knowledge, there are two representation approaches. One is to highly abstract and categorize existing knowledge including experiences into a series of design principles, rationales and constraints. TRIZ is a good instance of this approach. The other is to represent a collection of design knowledge into a certain case for description. Case-based design is an example of this approach. The key issue is on the computerization of the design knowledge representation.

MEGO. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:43, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or redirect. No-one has made a case that design knowledge does not exist: this material has been taught to engineering undergrads for decades. This article is not well written (though not bad for a newbie) but if there is nothing worth saving, could we redirect it to Design methods (that has its own problems) or Design? --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 08:18, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]