Wikipedia talk:WikiProject NLP concepts and methods

Welcome!

Agreed decisions (style, approach, etc)

1. Articles which would fall under this project should have the template {{NLPproject}} added to their page at the top, letting readers know that there is a project and possibly style or content standards concerning that page.
2. Pages that contain mixed NLP and non-NLP uses need consideration as to whether the subject matter warrants creating a separate NAME (NLP) article, if this might be helpful. (It won't always be appropriate, discuss here if unsure)

Articles involved and current status

A list of pages tagged as being part of the {{NLPproject}} can be found here

Quick ideas: the following would probably be considered examples of tools which were either developed within, or built into the core of, classic NLP. It's not necessarily complete yet. The categorization is mine, for convenience:

Definitions and principles

• map-territory relation
• People have the ability to learn and change
• No failure only feedback
• If it doesnt work try something new
• Form/content distinction
• intensive/extensive defintions (1975)
• Principles of NLP

Models

• Metamodel
• Milton Model
• Parts model (Virginia Satir)
• 6-step reframe (John Grinder & Richard Bandler).
• Swish (Christina Hall and Richard Bandler)
• Ericksonian hypnotherapy (as distinct from milton model)
• Well-formed outcome
• Perceptual positions (NLP) (triple description)
• Timeline (NLP) The concept of spatially working with time ("physicalised timelines")
• Strategy ellicitation (T.O.T.E. testing methodology)
• Transderivational search
• Working with and communicating through associated/dissociated states (NLP)
• Metaprograms
• The concept of different "states" / emotions - Structure of Emotions (Leslie Cameron Bandler)
• Double bind (NLP)
• 4-tuple (NLP) (aka. First Access, Primary Experience)
• Eye Accessing Cues
• Negotiation model (NLP)
• Verbal package (Precision model)
• State (NLP)

Working methods and tools

• Rapport (NLP) (Mirroring and matching, interest)
• Anchor (NLP) (Spatial marking, chaining anchors, collasping anchors, future pace, etc).
• Utilising unconscious signal systems
• Sensory Representation systems (VAKOG)
• Submodalities
• Ecology (NLP) (Ecology check)
• Simultaneous and sequential incongruence (NLP)
• Pace and lead
• Time frame (NLP)
• Metaphor (NLP)
• Reframing (NLP)
• Content Reframing
• Context Reframing
• Sensory Acuity (attention training, Callibration (NLP))
• Using body as impactor on mind and emotion (ie use of physiology to drive state)
• Outline of brief therapy (Rossi)
• High performance state games / (New Code Games)
• Core transformation
• Change personal history
• Reimprint (NLP)
• Modelling (NLP Modelling ... Analytic Modelling ... Other forms of modeling)
• Spatial (and voice tone) marking [a subject related to anchoring]
• As-if (NLP) frame
• State management

Theoretical constructs, definitions, background and other

• Neurological levels (Dilts and Bateson)
• Positive and negative (NLP)
• Research on NLP
• Persuasion uses of NLP
• Overview of NLP concepts and methods

General Discussion

Literature (1972-1985)

1. Structure of Magic Vol 1. 1975a (100 citations)
2. Structure of Magic Vol 2. 1975b
3. Frogs into Princes (Bandler & Grinder, 1979)
4. Reframing (19XX)
5. Unlimited Power (Robbins, 19XX)
6. Patterns of Milton Erickson Vol.1 (1976)
7. Patterns of Milton Erickson Vol.2 (1977)
8. NLP Volume 1 (Dilts et al. 1980)
9. Dilts, Roots of NLP (1983)
10. Dilts, Applications of NLP (1985?)

Do you want to include the developers in this Project. Or limit it to the concepts and theory only? --Comaze 10:26, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

The draft list of "original developers" is useful, but no, thats biography not NLP. Its a useful list so I'm putting it here for when we need it: Richard Bandler ... John Grinder ... Judith Delozier ... Robert Dilts ... Leslie Cameron-Bandler ... Stephen Gilligan ... Steve Andreas ... Connirae Andreas ... Christina Hall ... Frank Prucelik

Standardise citations.

1. I want to use standardised notation and citations throughout the entire project. The same style as in Structure of Magic Volume 1. --Comaze 10:30, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

   They should probably be heavily cited, more than usual, in view of the controvery surrounding the subject. Whilst I don't think there is such controversy over individual concepts or methods, it is clear some editors would wish for full formal citations, we should respect that, IMO. FT2 12:15, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

Categories

I have removed Template:NLPproject from pages which are *not* NLP pages, such as the map-territory article. We can look at those in a while. Meantime it would be presumptuous to be appearing to "claim" them for NLP. FT2 15:39, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

template

Please don't add the template to articles, rather add it to the talk pages. see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Whatlinkshere/Template:NLPproject to see which articles need it moving onto talk pages. thanks Martin 16:42, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

Okay. Removed to talk pages. User:Comaze note :)

Also, no need (yet) to create blank pages without content -- not really wikipedia policy is it to allow those??? Or at least add a few lines from a source text and a {{stub}} tag FT2 17:59, 30 October 2005 (UTC)