Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SCAR (programming language) (third nomination)

Discussion to run until at least 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Still no reliable sources, and sketchier than it was the last time it was deleted. David Eppstein (talk) 01:21, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Don't you think that the product website is a reliable enough source for the product in question? GSMR (talk) 02:03, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- For its existence, sure. WP:N requires more than that, though. —David Eppstein (talk) 02:09, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless notability can be proven, which doesn't seem too likely. GSMR: product websites and the like cannot be used to establish notability - see WP:SPS. Xenon54 (talk) 02:34, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as not notable. Just some random, unpopular, Win32 closed-source language. --Cybercobra (talk) 09:59, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as not notable. Just a failed, unpopular software product.Yobmod (talk) 12:16, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]