Talk:Federal Identity Program
![]() | Canada: Governments Start‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||||
|
This page may actually become more important than it is depending on the findings of the Gomery inquiry so I am going to come back to it later to do some more work. Greyfedora 02:52, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I'll try to get a picture soon of the new sign at the National Research Council of Canada building down the street. Ouuplas 22:51, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
Hi! I've expanded on the numerous facets of the FIP, uploading higher-resolution images of logos, etc.; I can increase the resolution/quality even more, but that may be counterproductive. To that end, I've mildly reorganised the article (e.g., placed upfront the notable Canadarm pic). E Pluribus Anthony | talk | 14:46, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
I don't want to cause any trouble, but -ize spellings are much more common in Canada. The Canadian Press Stylebook calls for -ize rather than -ise, for example. Since this article is about Canada I think Canadian practices should be used. Greyfedora 19:30, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Since a new government was formed by the Right Honourable Stephen Harper and the Conservative Party of Canada, a new maple leaf image has appear on documents and websites of the Her Majesty's Government in Right of Canada. Would this be part of the Federal Identity Programme? user:ctjj.stevenson 1831 hours 02 December 2007
The maple leaf image referred to above is not actually part of the FIP. It's mandatory on federal websites as part of the GoC's standards ("Common Look and Feel for the Internet") aimed at ensuring consistency for its online presences.--Smithpcw (talk) 14:50, 20 January 2009 (UTC)