Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interoperable PDK Libraries
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Star Mississippi (talk | contribs) at 01:50, 29 December 2008 (Closing debate, result was no consensus). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 01:50, 29 December 2008 by Star Mississippi (talk | contribs) (Closing debate, result was no consensus)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. and I don't think re-listing again will bring closer to one. StarM 01:50, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Interoperable PDK Libraries (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable. i think this can be speedied, but there could be problems, so AFD. It seems to be promoting some sort of technology. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 06:37, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. Not sure whether this is promoting a non-notable trade group or meant to promote a new technology; whatever it is, it seems not to be notable. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:12, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:08, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 01:46, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Notability does not appear to be confirmed. Ecoleetage (talk) 01:48, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong keep. Two articles on the subject done by Reuters: [1], [2]. Also a few other articles from other websites that establish notability: [3], [4]. Definitely notable. Malinaccier (talk) 03:28, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Doesn't look notable. Delete StonerDude420 (talk) 07:12, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Malinaccier. Jerry delusional ¤ kangaroo 00:32, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.