Talk:List of object–relational mapping software

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for deletion on January 24, 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

Someone please explain the criteria for being "notable". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.235.181.115 (talk) 03:48, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Really pleased that this page was started. Having a list of ORM tools is really useful, but having the list elsewhere was just too close to spam. What would be nice is some kind of comparison between the tools. Erichero 10:29, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nice spam page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.221.125.7 (talk) 13:57, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Diamond Binding was removed a few versions ago, why? It's clearly an ORM package. And also one of my favourite. What makes it any less of a candidate than a heap of shit like d00dads? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.45.170.249 (talk) 00:35, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 5 March 2008 75% of the links were removed by Hu12... I'm partial to BuzzSQL, but who's to say what "well-known" is? My experience in JAVA ORM says that Torque in particular is certainly well known. No one could be versed enough on all the different languages that have an ORM to make a decision on adding or removing one ORM tool or the other. 64.94.198.252 (talk) 18:03, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like Hu12 had a vendetta against d&c diamond binding in particular. I came here from answers.com, and thought the article had been deleted due to vandalism. Looking more it seems like any mention of them has been expunged from wiki. You add any mention to their domain and your edit fails - pretty incredible - im not up on any wikipedia blacklisting stuff - but going by the answers.com article it didnt look very spammy. Probably this crap should be reviewed by someone who knows what they are doing 150.101.16.233 (talk) 04:25, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't DB_DataObject a PHP ORM? In the PEAR repository. I don't see that in the list. I think there are more in PEAR too. 85.224.94.162 (talk) 17:19, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]