Jump to content

Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Candidate statements/DG

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006 | Candidate statements
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by DG~enwiki (talk | contribs) at 02:21, 17 October 2005. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

My statement is reproduced here:

Yes, I realise that everyone else who is standing for election is filling their statement with abstract philosophical views, but I don't think that's the most effective and pragmatic approach. I intend to bring a (sorely needed) sense of humour and perspective to the proceedings of the committee. Perhaps then disputes could be handled more fairly and efficiently. Excessive seriousness and organisation can be counter-productive to any work. With work so important and serious as that of this committee, airs of seriousness or importance could be lethal D. G. 02:17, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Questions

  1. Would you be terrific, in your post? D. G. 02:21, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    Absolutely. There is no doubt about it, to be certain. D. G. 02:17, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Blah blah blither blather ArbCom? Andre (talk) 02:18, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    I beg to differ on that issue, Andre. Respectfully. D. G. 02:21, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_January_2006/Candidate_statements/DG&oldid=25705243"